Talk:Superman: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why does this get a page for one small mention? -- [[User:Anythingspossibleforapossible|Anythingspossibleforapossible]] 05:32, 13 July 2011 (EDT) | Why does this get a page for one small mention? -- [[User:Anythingspossibleforapossible|Anythingspossibleforapossible]] 05:32, 13 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
:Because that's how we roll? Seriously, there's an article on [[Frijol]]es here! Also, Superman is awesome. One mention is all he needs. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 05:34, 13 July 2011 (EDT) | :Because that's how we roll? Seriously, there's an article on [[Frijol]]es here! Also, Superman is awesome. One mention is all he needs. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 05:34, 13 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
::As awesome as he may be, it seems a waste when it's comparable to a passing reference that can easily be forgotten a second later. But as you've said it's how things are done here. -- [[User:Anythingspossibleforapossible|Anythingspossibleforapossible]] 06:04, 13 July 2011 (EDT) | |||
:::How is it a "waste"? It's not as if the existence of this article takes away from more notable things. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 04:29, 15 July 2011 (EDT) | |||
::::It could easily just be in the notes section. -- [[User:Anythingspossibleforapossible|Anythingspossibleforapossible]] 21:05, 20 July 2011 (EDT) | |||
:::::And? --[[User:Andrusi|Andrusi]] 14:41, 27 September 2011 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:41, 27 September 2011
Why does this get a page for one small mention? -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 05:32, 13 July 2011 (EDT)
- Because that's how we roll? Seriously, there's an article on Frijoles here! Also, Superman is awesome. One mention is all he needs. --Detour 05:34, 13 July 2011 (EDT)
- As awesome as he may be, it seems a waste when it's comparable to a passing reference that can easily be forgotten a second later. But as you've said it's how things are done here. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 06:04, 13 July 2011 (EDT)
- How is it a "waste"? It's not as if the existence of this article takes away from more notable things. —Interrobang 04:29, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- It could easily just be in the notes section. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 21:05, 20 July 2011 (EDT)
- And? --Andrusi 14:41, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
- It could easily just be in the notes section. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 21:05, 20 July 2011 (EDT)
- How is it a "waste"? It's not as if the existence of this article takes away from more notable things. —Interrobang 04:29, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- As awesome as he may be, it seems a waste when it's comparable to a passing reference that can easily be forgotten a second later. But as you've said it's how things are done here. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 06:04, 13 July 2011 (EDT)
