Talk:Roadbuster affair: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:We'll make the appropriate edits once the full issue is released. --[[User:Nu-Priest|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest|talk]]) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | :We'll make the appropriate edits once the full issue is released. --[[User:Nu-Priest|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest|talk]]) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
::It was still speculative and shouldn't have been added in the first place. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 12:48, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ::It was still speculative and shouldn't have been added in the first place. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 12:48, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
::It was absolutely ''not'' speculative. before that issue came out, Roberts actively tweeted that the issue would feature "a specific link to LSOTW #1 (...) a *tiny* loose end that's taken nearly six years to tie up." He was deliberately referencing the Roadbuster Affair with that issue. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely|talk]]) 12:51, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:51, 23 April 2016
Welp that wasn't the roadbuster if the preview for Sins of the Wrecker #4 is to go by....--Projectus (talk) 01:14, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- We'll make the appropriate edits once the full issue is released. --Nu-Priest (talk) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- It was still speculative and shouldn't have been added in the first place. Saix (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- It was absolutely not speculative. before that issue came out, Roberts actively tweeted that the issue would feature "a specific link to LSOTW #1 (...) a *tiny* loose end that's taken nearly six years to tie up." He was deliberately referencing the Roadbuster Affair with that issue. - Chris McFeely (talk) 12:51, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
