Talk:Roadbuster affair: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:We'll make the appropriate edits once the full issue is released. --[[User:Nu-Priest|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest|talk]]) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | :We'll make the appropriate edits once the full issue is released. --[[User:Nu-Priest|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest|talk]]) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
::It was still speculative and shouldn't have been added in the first place. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 12:48, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ::It was still speculative and shouldn't have been added in the first place. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 12:48, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::It was absolutely ''not'' speculative. before that issue came out, Roberts actively tweeted that the issue would feature "a specific link to LSOTW #1 (...) a *tiny* loose end that's taken nearly six years to tie up." | :::It was absolutely ''not'' speculative. before that issue came out, Roberts actively tweeted that the issue would feature "a specific link to LSOTW #1 (...) a *tiny* loose end that's taken nearly six years to tie up." The term "terrible affair" wasn't used coincidentally; it was deliberately referencing the Roadbuster Affair. Matter of fact, in this preview, Tarantulas doesn't even specifically state that this "dead cadets" business is the Affair - he just lists it as one of the things Impetus has pulled out, and we know from last issue that the computer has yielded ''more'' than just the three things he lists. We don't even know if Roadbuster is part of the Wreckers when this flashback takes place. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely|talk]]) 12:51, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:55, 23 April 2016
Welp that wasn't the roadbuster if the preview for Sins of the Wrecker #4 is to go by....--Projectus (talk) 01:14, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- We'll make the appropriate edits once the full issue is released. --Nu-Priest (talk) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- It was still speculative and shouldn't have been added in the first place. Saix (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- It was absolutely not speculative. before that issue came out, Roberts actively tweeted that the issue would feature "a specific link to LSOTW #1 (...) a *tiny* loose end that's taken nearly six years to tie up." The term "terrible affair" wasn't used coincidentally; it was deliberately referencing the Roadbuster Affair. Matter of fact, in this preview, Tarantulas doesn't even specifically state that this "dead cadets" business is the Affair - he just lists it as one of the things Impetus has pulled out, and we know from last issue that the computer has yielded more than just the three things he lists. We don't even know if Roadbuster is part of the Wreckers when this flashback takes place. - Chris McFeely (talk) 12:51, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- It was still speculative and shouldn't have been added in the first place. Saix (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
