Talk:Titan (group): Difference between revisions
m Chris McFeely moved page Talk:Metrotitan (body-type) to Talk:Titan (IDW): Best just do this now then - "body-type" doesn't really work anymore, and "species" is taken. |
→Continuity-neutral opening: new section |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Given how vastly different Chela - and possibly some other - Metrotitans appear, would it be more prudent to change the parenthetical to (group) or something like that? Just a thought. [[User:Magaroja|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja|talk]]) 07:31, 26 September 2015 (EDT) | Given how vastly different Chela - and possibly some other - Metrotitans appear, would it be more prudent to change the parenthetical to (group) or something like that? Just a thought. [[User:Magaroja|Magaroja]] ([[User talk:Magaroja|talk]]) 07:31, 26 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
:That would make sense to me... [[User:ZeroSD|ZeroSD]] ([[User talk:ZeroSD|talk]]) 03:37, 28 September 2015 (EDT) | :That would make sense to me... [[User:ZeroSD|ZeroSD]] ([[User talk:ZeroSD|talk]]) 03:37, 28 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
== Continuity-neutral opening == | |||
If the lead section is going to be continuity-neutral, then I feel that Fortress Maximus and Trypticon don't belong because they are only Titans in one continuity. Or on the other hand, if it's going to say "known Titans include", then shouldn't all Titans go in the list? Also, the IDW continuity section's chronological order is a bit wonky since Zac's "overhaul". [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 14:53, 6 July 2017 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:53, 6 July 2017
Operation Combination
Can Operation Combination's Metrobase be considered a Metrotitan? Hida Atarasi 21:09, 23 September 2012 (EDT)
Possible rename to "Metrotitan (group)"?
Given how vastly different Chela - and possibly some other - Metrotitans appear, would it be more prudent to change the parenthetical to (group) or something like that? Just a thought. Magaroja (talk) 07:31, 26 September 2015 (EDT)
Continuity-neutral opening
If the lead section is going to be continuity-neutral, then I feel that Fortress Maximus and Trypticon don't belong because they are only Titans in one continuity. Or on the other hand, if it's going to say "known Titans include", then shouldn't all Titans go in the list? Also, the IDW continuity section's chronological order is a bit wonky since Zac's "overhaul". S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2017 (EDT)
