Talk:Brainstorm (G1)/2005 IDW continuity: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would anyone mind if I moved Brainstorm's appearance in Old Ways to the trivia section? It's pretty clearly been retconed and I think it's unnecessarily confusing to leave it where it is. [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]] ([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 17:51, 24 April 2017 (EDT) | Would anyone mind if I moved Brainstorm's appearance in Old Ways to the trivia section? It's pretty clearly been retconed and I think it's unnecessarily confusing to leave it where it is. [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]] ([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 17:51, 24 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
:An appearance is still an appearance, even if it has been retconned. [[User:Escargon|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon|talk]]) 17:54, 24 April 2017 (EDT) | :An appearance is still an appearance, even if it has been retconned. [[User:Escargon|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon|talk]]) 17:54, 24 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
::I'm not saying delete it entirely, just move it to trivia, or at least make it a note. The current phrasing, and positioning as the first line of the fiction section, suggests that the "contradiction" is actually important when it's probably never going to be brought up at all. [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]] ([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 06:56, 25 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:56, 25 April 2017
Would anyone mind if I moved Brainstorm's appearance in Old Ways to the trivia section? It's pretty clearly been retconed and I think it's unnecessarily confusing to leave it where it is. Omegatron (talk) 17:51, 24 April 2017 (EDT)
- An appearance is still an appearance, even if it has been retconned. Escargon (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2017 (EDT)
- I'm not saying delete it entirely, just move it to trivia, or at least make it a note. The current phrasing, and positioning as the first line of the fiction section, suggests that the "contradiction" is actually important when it's probably never going to be brought up at all. Omegatron (talk) 06:56, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
