User talk:Vectorwing: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
→STOP: new section |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
ok thank you for helping me understand Tindalos. | ok thank you for helping me understand Tindalos. | ||
:Stop adding categories if you're not competent at it. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 22:27, 27 March 2018 (EDT) | :Stop adding categories if you're not competent at it. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 22:27, 27 March 2018 (EDT) | ||
== STOP == | |||
{{correctenglish}} | |||
Revision as of 03:40, 28 March 2018
Please stop branding every non-character drone an Autobot or a Decepticon. That's not how it works. Saix (talk) 19:45, 27 March 2018 (EDT)
- He is right about some of them, though; you wouldn't remove a Vehicon symbol from the various drones there. Certainly, I don't think things like the Alligatorcon require it, but not everything he's added to is wrong. Escargon (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2018 (EDT)
- Ah wait, nevermind, I thought you were talking about the faction symbols at the top of the page. Escargon (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2018 (EDT)
If it has a faction symbol it is only right that it should be on a decepticons or autobots list. Vectorwing
- No, they're just associated with the factions. It's like the Ark or the Autobot code, they're Autobot related, but not Autobots. Tindalos (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2018 (EDT)
Battle Android Troopers are not Decepticons. Auto-Combatants are not Autobots. The Alligaticon is not a Decepticon. Stop adding this. - Chris McFeely (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2018 (EDT) ok thank you for helping me understand Tindalos.
