Fanon: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
==Examples==
==Examples==
Fanon terms or ideas that later became canon:
Fanon terms or ideas that later became canon:
* "Gestalt" as a term for [[combiner]]s.
* "Gestalt" as a term for [[combiner]]s
* The [[Rainmaker|acid rain-creating team]] literally being named "Rainmakers"
* The [[Rainmaker|acid rain-creating team]] literally being named "Rainmakers"
* [[Greatshot]] being an upgraded form of [[Sixshot]]
* [[Greatshot]] being an upgraded form of [[Sixshot]]
Line 11: Line 11:
* The name of the Predacon ship being the [[Darksyde (BW)|''Darkside'' or ''Darksyde'']]
* The name of the Predacon ship being the [[Darksyde (BW)|''Darkside'' or ''Darksyde'']]
* [[Tarantulas (BW)|Tarantulas]] literally [[Unicron's Spawn|being affiliated]] with [[Unicron]]
* [[Tarantulas (BW)|Tarantulas]] literally [[Unicron's Spawn|being affiliated]] with [[Unicron]]
* The [[Magnaboss (BW)|Magnaboss]] constituent trio of [[Prowl (G1)|Prowl]], [[Ironhide (G1)|Ironhide]], and [[Silverbolt (G1)|Silverbolt]]  
* The [[Magnaboss (BW)|Magnaboss]] constituent trio of [[Prowl (G1)|Prowl]], [[Ironhide (G1)|Ironhide]], and [[Silverbolt (G1)|Silverbolt]] being the Generation 1 characters of the same name
* The ''[[Beast Wars II: Super Lifeform Transformers (cartoon)|Beast Wars II]]'' and ''[[Super Lifeform Transformers: Beast Wars Neo (cartoon)|Beast Wars Neo]]'' casts hailing from the same timeframe as the ''[[Beast Wars: Transformers (cartoon)|Beast Wars]]'' cast (in some continuities)
* The ''[[Beast Wars II: Super Lifeform Transformers (cartoon)|Beast Wars II]]'' and ''[[Super Lifeform Transformers: Beast Wars Neo (cartoon)|Beast Wars Neo]]'' casts hailing from the same timeframe as the ''[[Beast Wars: Transformers (cartoon)|Beast Wars]]'' cast (sometimes)
* The [[Transformers: Armada (toyline)|''Armada'' beast redecoes]] being [[Unicron's Four Horsemen|Unicron's "horsemen"]]
* The [[Transformers: Armada (toyline)|''Armada'' beast redecoes]] being [[Unicron's Four Horsemen|Unicron's "horsemen"]]
* "[[Herald of Unicron]]"  
* "[[Herald of Unicron]]"  
Line 21: Line 21:


Fanon terms or ideas that never became canon:
Fanon terms or ideas that never became canon:
* [[Seeker (body-type)|Seeker]]s being teamed up in pseudo-familial "trines"
* [[Dion (G1)|Dion]] having been rebuilt into somebody "important"
* [[Dion (G1)|Dion]] having been rebuilt into somebody "important"
* [[Metrotitan (Zone)|Metrotitan]] being a "[[zombie]]" [[Metroplex (G1)|Metroplex]], or [[cloning|cloned]] from a severed leg
* [[Metrotitan (Zone)|Metrotitan]] being a "[[zombie]]" [[Metroplex (G1)|Metroplex]], or [[cloning|cloned]] from a severed leg

Revision as of 05:17, 2 February 2019

Fanon is a portmanteau word formed from the words "fan" and "canon". It refers to so-called "facts" that a significant number of fans think are true, but for which there is no evidence in any official material. A piece of fanon usually becomes widespread due to having been discussed and picked up by other fans. Some fanon is based on misinterpretations of canon (especially when translations from Japanese material are involved) and some is simply stuff fans made up. While fanon originates with fans rather than the official canon of the Transformers multiverse, it sometimes becomes incorporated into the canon via retcon or other means if a writer decides to establish the fans' interpretation in official fiction. Sometimes, this can also happen because an official writer mistakes fanon for established canon.

Misuse of the term has broadened the word's definition (among some) to include fan-characters and fan fiction. (See "Transfanon Wiki" link below.) The difference is that fan-fiction is an extension built upon canon, while fanon is an interpretation or explanation of existing canon.

Examples

Fanon terms or ideas that later became canon:

Fanon terms or ideas that never became canon:

Fanon and this wiki

TFWiki.net generally tries to avoid including fanon, until it becomes so widespread that excluding it is quixotic. Even then, however, fanon should be clearly identified as such. The best way to reference fanon in articles without interrupting the coverage of actual canon is to confine it to trivia notes sections (or, if really necessary, clearly marked notes within a paragraph.)