Talk:Lawbhammer: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
: There's already a note about this. The "aw" comes from the "claw" part of "Lobclaw". -[[User:Ookalf|Ookalf]] ([[User talk:Ookalf|talk]]) 19:46, 10 June 2020 (EDT)
: There's already a note about this. The "aw" comes from the "claw" part of "Lobclaw". -[[User:Ookalf|Ookalf]] ([[User talk:Ookalf|talk]]) 19:46, 10 June 2020 (EDT)
:: Yeah, as much as "Lobhammer" would definitely be the superior name in an actual translation, "Lawbhammer" conveys that it's not ''actually'' the "Lob" out of Lobclaw. --[[User:Riptide|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide|talk]]) 20:14, 10 June 2020 (EDT)
:: Yeah, as much as "Lobhammer" would definitely be the superior name in an actual translation, "Lawbhammer" conveys that it's not ''actually'' the "Lob" out of Lobclaw. --[[User:Riptide|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide|talk]]) 20:14, 10 June 2020 (EDT)
:::we're going to get a generations selects "lawbhammer" some day and it's going to be the wiki's fault --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky|talk]]) 22:07, 10 June 2020 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:07, 11 June 2020

...so we have Lobclaw and..... Lawbhammer, huh? why --ItsWalky (talk) 19:06, 10 June 2020 (EDT)

There's already a note about this. The "aw" comes from the "claw" part of "Lobclaw". -Ookalf (talk) 19:46, 10 June 2020 (EDT)
Yeah, as much as "Lobhammer" would definitely be the superior name in an actual translation, "Lawbhammer" conveys that it's not actually the "Lob" out of Lobclaw. --Riptide (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2020 (EDT)
we're going to get a generations selects "lawbhammer" some day and it's going to be the wiki's fault --ItsWalky (talk) 22:07, 10 June 2020 (EDT)