Talk:Transformers: The Ultimate Guide: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Derik (talk | contribs)
2nd Edition
Line 4: Line 4:
::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."
::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."
:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:::Thank you.  That burns, but I was asking for it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>
:::Thank you.  That burns, but I was asking for it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 
== 2nd Edition ==
 
What, exactly, was added for the updated edition? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 19:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Revision as of 19:40, 21 August 2007

Excluding RID stories

The info about Saban and Disney is all correct. However, I recall that convention reports from Auto Assembly, posted to ATT and Allspark, reported Furman saying he would have cut RID anyway--either because he didn't like it, or because assorted short stuff had to be pruned to allow more room for the then-upcoming Energon, or both. Can anyone clear that up?--Thylacine 2000 18:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Bit o' digging dug this up. And I quote:
"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."
Bah. - Chris McFeely 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. That burns, but I was asking for it. --Thylacine 2000 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

2nd Edition

What, exactly, was added for the updated edition? -Derik 19:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)