Talk:Pax Cybertronia: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Pax Cybertronia was unilateral, rather than a negotiated agreement (albeit, between unequal parties)? That's a pretty big claim, since it would mean that the agreement was forced on the losers, and strongly imply an unconditional surrender. Is this officially stated somewhere? (Too many bits of weird canon out there that aren't well known, and have no citations) [[User:Gustavo|Gustavo]] 08:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC) | The Pax Cybertronia was unilateral, rather than a negotiated agreement (albeit, between unequal parties)? That's a pretty big claim, since it would mean that the agreement was forced on the losers, and strongly imply an unconditional surrender. Is this officially stated somewhere? (Too many bits of weird canon out there that aren't well known, and have no citations) [[User:Gustavo|Gustavo]] 08:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
:[http://www.botcon.com/archive/story/2001/page1.jpg unilateral] -<span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 15px;">[[User:Derik|Derik]]</span> 10:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC) | :[http://www.botcon.com/archive/story/2001/page1.jpg unilateral] -<span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 15px;">[[User:Derik|Derik]]</span> 10:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:03, 27 March 2009
The Pax Cybertronia was unilateral, rather than a negotiated agreement (albeit, between unequal parties)? That's a pretty big claim, since it would mean that the agreement was forced on the losers, and strongly imply an unconditional surrender. Is this officially stated somewhere? (Too many bits of weird canon out there that aren't well known, and have no citations) Gustavo 08:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- unilateral -Derik 10:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
