Talk:Stylor: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Low Armor Class? |
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Low Armor Class?== | ==Low Armor Class?== | ||
''low armor class''<BR> | |||
It used to be that in D&D low armor class was good, but for the past few years ''high'' armor class has been good. Either I don't get this joke, or it's out of date. [[User:JW|JW]] 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | It used to be that in D&D low armor class was good, but for the past few years ''high'' armor class has been good. Either I don't get this joke, or it's out of date. [[User:JW|JW]] 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:As an 80's toy, low armor class is definitely what is aimed for...--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 15:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 15:20, 28 September 2007
Low Armor Class?
low armor class
It used to be that in D&D low armor class was good, but for the past few years high armor class has been good. Either I don't get this joke, or it's out of date. JW 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- As an 80's toy, low armor class is definitely what is aimed for...--Rosicrucian 15:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
