Talk:Icepick (G1): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'm all for card art for at least some of these guys (particularly since it's some of the best package art ever), though a mixture of this and that is presumably best. Do we have an open license to borrow from Botch's archives, or what?... | :I'm all for card art for at least some of these guys (particularly since it's some of the best package art ever), though a mixture of this and that is presumably best. Do we have an open license to borrow from Botch's archives, or what?... | ||
:Dunno about the quote. Given that the MPs have hardly ever appeared in any fiction ever, I guess it's probably fanfic. -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] 18:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | :Dunno about the quote. Given that the MPs have hardly ever appeared in any fiction ever, I guess it's probably fanfic. -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] 18:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:28, 27 March 2009
Seriously. If that opening quote is not actually from a canon source, it needs to be deleted. Also... goddamn, let's get some different main art. Preferably his card-art. --M Sipher 18:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm all for card art for at least some of these guys (particularly since it's some of the best package art ever), though a mixture of this and that is presumably best. Do we have an open license to borrow from Botch's archives, or what?...
- Dunno about the quote. Given that the MPs have hardly ever appeared in any fiction ever, I guess it's probably fanfic. -- Repowers 18:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
