Talk:Roadjammers: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why is their only fictional appearance in the description? This ain't the Wikipedia. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | Why is their only fictional appearance in the description? This ain't the Wikipedia. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I assume they just totally lack any other appearance or relevance. I've seen other articles like this - though I can't recall what they are - and in such cases it seemed logical to me that, lacking any reason to internally disambiguate appearances or characterizations, the description could serve as the total article. To do otherwise seems to overcomplicate the article. Are there examples of doing otherwise? --[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 08:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | :I assume they just totally lack any other appearance or relevance. I've seen other articles like this - though I can't recall what they are - and in such cases it seemed logical to me that, lacking any reason to internally disambiguate appearances or characterizations, the description could serve as the total article. To do otherwise seems to overcomplicate the article. Are there examples of doing otherwise? --[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 08:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
::[[Rorza, the Rocket-cycle Racer from Rigel III|Only a fool forgets Rorza, the Rocket-cycle Racer from Rigel III!]] --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 09:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 09:27, 28 February 2008
Why is their only fictional appearance in the description? This ain't the Wikipedia. --FFN 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- I assume they just totally lack any other appearance or relevance. I've seen other articles like this - though I can't recall what they are - and in such cases it seemed logical to me that, lacking any reason to internally disambiguate appearances or characterizations, the description could serve as the total article. To do otherwise seems to overcomplicate the article. Are there examples of doing otherwise? --Sntint 08:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Only a fool forgets Rorza, the Rocket-cycle Racer from Rigel III! --FFN 09:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
