Category talk:Nameless things: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::I agree with Kil. It seems to me that if this list serves any practical purpose, it's to alert people to articles that could use a canon-supported name if one exists. You never know what somebody might dredge up from a long-lost Japanese guidebook or something. Including actually-named subjects in the list muddies the issue, I think. - [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 04:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ::I agree with Kil. It seems to me that if this list serves any practical purpose, it's to alert people to articles that could use a canon-supported name if one exists. You never know what somebody might dredge up from a long-lost Japanese guidebook or something. Including actually-named subjects in the list muddies the issue, I think. - [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 04:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I can see Interrobang's point- but IMO this category has the same 'logic' as '[[:Category:Toy-only characters|Toy-only characters]]'. Once a character has a fiction appearance ''anywhere'' they're booted out. Similarly- one a character/thing gets a name... out. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 04:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ::I can see Interrobang's point- but IMO this category has the same 'logic' as '[[:Category:Toy-only characters|Toy-only characters]]'. Once a character has a fiction appearance ''anywhere'' they're booted out. Similarly- one a character/thing gets a name... out. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 04:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:14, 24 March 2009
Darksyde and Nemesis (G1) really shouldn't be in this category. I assume the logic is that they didn't have names during the original cartoon appearances, but nevertheless they do have names now. They are not "nameless things." --KilMichaelMcC 04:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- They were nameless things for long periods of time. I don't see the harm. —Interrobang 04:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Kil. It seems to me that if this list serves any practical purpose, it's to alert people to articles that could use a canon-supported name if one exists. You never know what somebody might dredge up from a long-lost Japanese guidebook or something. Including actually-named subjects in the list muddies the issue, I think. - Jackpot 04:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I can see Interrobang's point- but IMO this category has the same 'logic' as 'Toy-only characters'. Once a character has a fiction appearance anywhere they're booted out. Similarly- one a character/thing gets a name... out. -Derik 04:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
