Talk:Autotransforming: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
Bluestreak7 (talk | contribs) m pipe dead link |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==What about the Duocons?== | ==What about the Duocons?== | ||
I own both Duocons, and they both seem to be based around autotransforming when the air half is combined with the land half, trigering the springs in both (although I've only gotten each of the pair to actualy pull that off ONCE individually, but they're [[bricks]] anyways). I think the Duocons should be listed here because of their (slightly flawed) spring transformations. | I own both Duocons, and they both seem to be based around autotransforming when the air half is combined with the land half, trigering the springs in both (although I've only gotten each of the pair to actualy pull that off ONCE individually, but they're [[brick|bricks]] anyways). I think the Duocons should be listed here because of their (slightly flawed) spring transformations. | ||
==The move== | ==The move== | ||
Shouldn't it be at "[[Autotransformation]]"? We don't typically use gerunds as article titles, either. -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] 20:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC) | Shouldn't it be at "[[Autotransformation]]"? We don't typically use gerunds as article titles, either. -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] 20:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:21, 30 June 2009
- This page should NOT be merged with "automrph"
What about the Duocons?
I own both Duocons, and they both seem to be based around autotransforming when the air half is combined with the land half, trigering the springs in both (although I've only gotten each of the pair to actualy pull that off ONCE individually, but they're bricks anyways). I think the Duocons should be listed here because of their (slightly flawed) spring transformations.
The move
Shouldn't it be at "Autotransformation"? We don't typically use gerunds as article titles, either. -- Repowers 20:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
