Talk:Firecracker: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You know, I really think their alt-mode specifics are better served in the "Toy" section, espeically since you've made those pretty lean. I mean, you don't want to get too physically specific about a character in their profile, because, well, you never know. --[[User:24.163.117.5|24.163.117.5]] 08:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC) | You know, I really think their alt-mode specifics are better served in the "Toy" section, espeically since you've made those pretty lean. I mean, you don't want to get too physically specific about a character in their profile, because, well, you never know. --[[User:24.163.117.5|24.163.117.5]] 08:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
:I kinda thought using the alt-mode model names would make the text a bit more interesting than just saying "car mode" or the like. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 11:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC) | :I kinda thought using the alt-mode model names would make the text a bit more interesting than just saying "car mode" or the like. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 11:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
Are there photos of the Racing Rig packaging art? I've never seen it. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:32, 1 May 2009 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:32, 1 May 2009
You know, I really think their alt-mode specifics are better served in the "Toy" section, espeically since you've made those pretty lean. I mean, you don't want to get too physically specific about a character in their profile, because, well, you never know. --24.163.117.5 08:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- I kinda thought using the alt-mode model names would make the text a bit more interesting than just saying "car mode" or the like. --KilMichaelMcC 11:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Are there photos of the Racing Rig packaging art? I've never seen it. -Derik 00:32, 1 May 2009 (EDT)
