Talk:Multiversal singularity: Difference between revisions
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) Multiversal hand-wringing. |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Personally, I think we may be spazzing out a bit too much about supposed "inconsistencies" in the Multiversal Singularities theory. It's getting to the point where we're editorializing about it in articles, and that I think is the time where we ought to step back and take a deep breath. Being a multiversal singularity obviously doesn't mean that the same events have to occur in every universe, nor that what happens in one universe to a singularity has to affect their presence in all other universes. Certainly [[Omega Terminus]] is highly divergent from [[Vector Sigma]], even though it's a singularity. Certainly [[Primus]] has been devoured by [[Unicron]] in some universes, while he persists in others. So all the hand-wringing over whether [[The Fallen]] will wreck this seems a bit overblown to me, and certainly gets a bit too speculative to be included in the articles themselves..--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 14:03, 14 April 2009 (EDT) | Personally, I think we may be spazzing out a bit too much about supposed "inconsistencies" in the Multiversal Singularities theory. It's getting to the point where we're editorializing about it in articles, and that I think is the time where we ought to step back and take a deep breath. Being a multiversal singularity obviously doesn't mean that the same events have to occur in every universe, nor that what happens in one universe to a singularity has to affect their presence in all other universes. Certainly [[Omega Terminus]] is highly divergent from [[Vector Sigma]], even though it's a singularity. Certainly [[Primus]] has been devoured by [[Unicron]] in some universes, while he persists in others. So all the hand-wringing over whether [[The Fallen]] will wreck this seems a bit overblown to me, and certainly gets a bit too speculative to be included in the articles themselves..--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 14:03, 14 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
===Now that [[Hasbro]]'s given an answer=== | |||
Is it okay to put up some fanwank-y analysis anywhere on this wiki (outside of articles), like on this talk page or my user page? [[User:Item42|Item42]] 12:46, 15 March 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:46, 15 March 2010
Multiversal hand-wringing.
Personally, I think we may be spazzing out a bit too much about supposed "inconsistencies" in the Multiversal Singularities theory. It's getting to the point where we're editorializing about it in articles, and that I think is the time where we ought to step back and take a deep breath. Being a multiversal singularity obviously doesn't mean that the same events have to occur in every universe, nor that what happens in one universe to a singularity has to affect their presence in all other universes. Certainly Omega Terminus is highly divergent from Vector Sigma, even though it's a singularity. Certainly Primus has been devoured by Unicron in some universes, while he persists in others. So all the hand-wringing over whether The Fallen will wreck this seems a bit overblown to me, and certainly gets a bit too speculative to be included in the articles themselves..--RosicrucianTalk 14:03, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
Now that Hasbro's given an answer
Is it okay to put up some fanwank-y analysis anywhere on this wiki (outside of articles), like on this talk page or my user page? Item42 12:46, 15 March 2010 (EDT)
