Category talk:Franchises: Difference between revisions
m →Category suggestion: Delinking, as there doesn't seem to be any support for the idea |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Category suggestion == | == Category suggestion == | ||
I'd like to suggest creating | I'd like to suggest creating "Category:Hasbro franchises" and "Category:Takara franchises" to separate the franchises. --'''[[User:TX55|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 06:38, 16 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
==Categorizing== | ==Categorizing== | ||
Revision as of 00:23, 4 December 2009
I am not totally satisfied with the word "franchise" as I've used it here and in the continuities article, but I'm at a loss for anything better. I am open to suggestions if somebody has a better word. Whatever word we pick, I think it would help if all editors used it consistently.
--Steve-o 21:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Category suggestion
I'd like to suggest creating "Category:Hasbro franchises" and "Category:Takara franchises" to separate the franchises. --TX55TALK 06:38, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
Categorizing
IIRC, shouldn't NAME (franchise) be always on the top of its category? Take Victory for example, It should be look like:
which is
Victory (franchise) - [[Category:Victory| ]] Victory (cartoon) - [[Category:Victory|*]] Victory (manga) - [[Category:Victory|*]] Victory (toyline) - [[Category:Victory|*]]
Also, "Victory (franchise)" is already under Category:Victory, which is under Category:Franchises, why bother put "Victory (franchise)" under Category:Franchises, the repeat category?
