Talk:Power Core Combiners: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
ZacWilliam (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Unless its a "franchise" sort of page specifically about realworld stuff, isn't our general mandate to write In-universe about the fiction first and make the out-of-universe stuff kind of secondary info under toys/trivia. Power Core Combiners are very much an In Fiction concept. I think this page, as it is right now is much too Out-of-Universe focused. Especially the intro wich should probably mostly go under "Toys". It talks about toyline issues first and blows off fiction almost entirely to be adressed in other articles, when I think it belongs here more. Fixing things seems a big enough revision that I wanted to check if others felt the same before revising it all. --[[User:ZacWilliam|ZacWilliam]] 07:34, 7 June 2010 (EDT) | Unless its a "franchise" sort of page specifically about realworld stuff, isn't our general mandate to write In-universe about the fiction first and make the out-of-universe stuff kind of secondary info under toys/trivia. Power Core Combiners are very much an In Fiction concept. I think this page, as it is right now is much too Out-of-Universe focused. Especially the intro wich should probably mostly go under "Toys". It talks about toyline issues first and blows off fiction almost entirely to be adressed in other articles, when I think it belongs here more. Fixing things seems a big enough revision that I wanted to check if others felt the same before revising it all. --[[User:ZacWilliam|ZacWilliam]] 07:34, 7 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
:I think this was intended as a "franchise" page (or even a toyline page) when it was first made. The fictional concept does deserve a good work up, but it may belong on another page. However, since according to the intro this toyline is part of the larger TF2010 toyline shouldn't it be merged there? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 07:39, 7 June 2010 (EDT) | :I think this was intended as a "franchise" page (or even a toyline page) when it was first made. The fictional concept does deserve a good work up, but it may belong on another page. However, since according to the intro this toyline is part of the larger TF2010 toyline shouldn't it be merged there? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 07:39, 7 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
::Yeah this is written like a franchise page. But Power Core Combiners are an In-Fiction thing. Which means either we need 2 pages, something like: [[Power Core Combiner (franchise)]] and [[Power Core Combiner (technology)]] or this one needs to be revised to be about in-universe stuff first and toyline concerns second. --[[User:ZacWilliam|ZacWilliam]] 07:50, 7 June 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:50, 7 June 2010
Unless its a "franchise" sort of page specifically about realworld stuff, isn't our general mandate to write In-universe about the fiction first and make the out-of-universe stuff kind of secondary info under toys/trivia. Power Core Combiners are very much an In Fiction concept. I think this page, as it is right now is much too Out-of-Universe focused. Especially the intro wich should probably mostly go under "Toys". It talks about toyline issues first and blows off fiction almost entirely to be adressed in other articles, when I think it belongs here more. Fixing things seems a big enough revision that I wanted to check if others felt the same before revising it all. --ZacWilliam 07:34, 7 June 2010 (EDT)
- I think this was intended as a "franchise" page (or even a toyline page) when it was first made. The fictional concept does deserve a good work up, but it may belong on another page. However, since according to the intro this toyline is part of the larger TF2010 toyline shouldn't it be merged there? --Khajidha 07:39, 7 June 2010 (EDT)
- Yeah this is written like a franchise page. But Power Core Combiners are an In-Fiction thing. Which means either we need 2 pages, something like: Power Core Combiner (franchise) and Power Core Combiner (technology) or this one needs to be revised to be about in-universe stuff first and toyline concerns second. --ZacWilliam 07:50, 7 June 2010 (EDT)
