User talk:86.140.34.167: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Detour (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
None of the [[Universe (2008)]] toys had rubsigns, so I don't see why [[Acid Storm]] not having one would be surprising. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 02:32, 19 June 2010 (EDT)
None of the [[Universe (2008)]] toys had rubsigns, so I don't see why [[Acid Storm]] not having one would be surprising. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 02:32, 19 June 2010 (EDT)


:: Because the other Seekers (Starscream, Skywarp, Thundercracker etc.) that use that mold do have them. Excluding the Henkei releases. Although if I am wrong, fair enough. I wasn't aware it needed a discussion. -- 19:29, 19 June 2010 (GMT)
: Because the other Seekers (Starscream, Skywarp, Thundercracker etc.) that use that mold do have them. Excluding the Henkei releases. Although if I am wrong, fair enough. I wasn't aware it needed a discussion. -- 19:29, 19 June 2010 (GMT)
::The rubsigns were a gimmick exclusive to the Classics line. Universe Starscream does not have a rubsign either, nor do any other Universe toys, regardless of whether they are redecos or new toolings. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 16:11, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:11, 19 June 2010

None of the Universe (2008) toys had rubsigns, so I don't see why Acid Storm not having one would be surprising. --FFN 02:32, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

Because the other Seekers (Starscream, Skywarp, Thundercracker etc.) that use that mold do have them. Excluding the Henkei releases. Although if I am wrong, fair enough. I wasn't aware it needed a discussion. -- 19:29, 19 June 2010 (GMT)
The rubsigns were a gimmick exclusive to the Classics line. Universe Starscream does not have a rubsign either, nor do any other Universe toys, regardless of whether they are redecos or new toolings. --Detour 16:11, 19 June 2010 (EDT)