Talk:Starscream Clone Black Version: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Question in retrospect, though. Should he be at "Black clone" instead of "Black Clone", and does he need the nameless-designation template on him? --[[User:Monzo|Monzo]] 12:00, 16 July 2010 (EDT) | Question in retrospect, though. Should he be at "Black clone" instead of "Black Clone", and does he need the nameless-designation template on him? --[[User:Monzo|Monzo]] 12:00, 16 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
:I almost feel like he ought to be "Black Starscream clone", or something completely joyless like that. That does seem like a situation requirin' one'a them thar "nameless" templates.- [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 12:04, 16 July 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:04, 16 July 2010
... well, shoot, Chris. I was going off the Allspark report on these guys, and they must have had the name reversed, because I thought he was "Starscream Black Clone Ver". "Starscream Clone Black Ver" is a much stronger argument for the toy actually representing a new character.
Question in retrospect, though. Should he be at "Black clone" instead of "Black Clone", and does he need the nameless-designation template on him? --Monzo 12:00, 16 July 2010 (EDT)
- I almost feel like he ought to be "Black Starscream clone", or something completely joyless like that. That does seem like a situation requirin' one'a them thar "nameless" templates.- Chris McFeely 12:04, 16 July 2010 (EDT)
