File talk:Chevrolet-rotf gdatm-ads.jpg: Difference between revisions
→Deletion: if/if typo. *tch* |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Could I be provided an official justification for this action? The sandbox page in the User namespace it was destined for looks awfully strange without it. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:18, 13 June 2011 (EDT) | Could I be provided an official justification for this action? The sandbox page in the User namespace it was destined for looks awfully strange without it. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:18, 13 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
:May I also add-- [[Colleen Porch]] if it may be relevant to the answer? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:21, 13 June 2011 (EDT) | :May I also add-- [[Colleen Porch]] if it may be relevant to the answer? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:21, 13 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
WE GET IT. YOU ARE GAY. THAT HAS BEEN WELL ESTABLISHED. We don't need images of boys in tight underthings on the wiki just so you can go HEY LOOK AT ME GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY. Try doing helpful things instead. And posting about what looks for all the world to be a NON-HASBRO-SPONSORED EVENT is not part of it. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 00:36, 13 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:36, 13 June 2011
Those are the tightest briefs. I checked. --ItsWalky 23:30, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- For reference (in case someone's worried) the pic is for a sandbox draft on homosexuality.
- (I don't particularly think the wiki's ever gonna make the page live, but it's worth pecking at.)
- If anyone wants to make a page for the Chevy Gay Day at the Movies:ROTF promotion, by all means, go ahead! -Derik 23:33, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- As this appears to be a Chevy only thing and not a Hasbro thing, I'm disinclined to say it should get a page. --M Sipher 23:34, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- >implying homosexuality is a Chevy thing
- Anyway, the ads were allowed to use Hasbro trademarks such as the Autobot symbol, so it apparently falls under their partnership with Hasbro. -Derik 23:39, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- Which explains the complete and utter lack of any Hasbro trademark information on the ad, plus the fact that none of the cars are referred to by their character names. --M Sipher 23:50, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- But using Hasbro trademarks without permission would be improper! Are you suggesting Chevrolet broke the law? -Derik 00:05, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
- Which explains the complete and utter lack of any Hasbro trademark information on the ad, plus the fact that none of the cars are referred to by their character names. --M Sipher 23:50, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- As this appears to be a Chevy only thing and not a Hasbro thing, I'm disinclined to say it should get a page. --M Sipher 23:34, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
Also— if anyone knows where to find a video of the commercial I'd... appreciate it. (Apparently you can see the Bumblebee Transformers mask and sign for the promotion in some shots.) -Derik 23:35, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
Deletion
I'm sorry, this didn't appear to have undergone any formal deletion discussion. (in fact I don't recall any suggestion that it should be deleted at all.)
Could I be provided an official justification for this action? The sandbox page in the User namespace it was destined for looks awfully strange without it. -Derik 00:18, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
- May I also add-- Colleen Porch if it may be relevant to the answer? -Derik 00:21, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
WE GET IT. YOU ARE GAY. THAT HAS BEEN WELL ESTABLISHED. We don't need images of boys in tight underthings on the wiki just so you can go HEY LOOK AT ME GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY. Try doing helpful things instead. And posting about what looks for all the world to be a NON-HASBRO-SPONSORED EVENT is not part of it. --M Sipher 00:36, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
