Talk:Michael Dorn: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Well there's this. If you listen closley, that is Dorn as Prime.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtUy2bzakKs] | Well there's this. If you listen closley, that is Dorn as Prime.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtUy2bzakKs] | ||
:That is not a source. A source means a proper, reliable credit. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 22:05, 21 March 2012 (EDT) | :That is not a source. A source means a proper, reliable credit. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 22:05, 21 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
::It also makes no sense; why pay Michael Dorn to impersonate Peter Cullen when you can just hire Peter Cullen and likely save money by doing so? -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] 22:34, 21 March 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:34, 22 March 2012
Yeeeeeeah, uh, I really don't think that's actually Michael Dorn. - Chris McFeely 21:22, 21 March 2012 (EDT)
- Yeah, gonna need a source on that. --Detour 21:51, 21 March 2012 (EDT)
Well there's this. If you listen closley, that is Dorn as Prime.[1]
- That is not a source. A source means a proper, reliable credit. --Detour 22:05, 21 March 2012 (EDT)
- It also makes no sense; why pay Michael Dorn to impersonate Peter Cullen when you can just hire Peter Cullen and likely save money by doing so? -- Dark T Zeratul 22:34, 21 March 2012 (EDT)
