Talk:Continuity family: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==RiD== | |||
''Robots in Disguise'' is not really a "continuity family" in the technical sense of the term as, to my knowledge, there's only one RID continuity. The one comic it got was also placed in its animated continuity, and all of the uses of its characters in ''Universe'' and the Fan Club ''Cybertron'' comic are also sprung from the cartoon's universe. How should we address that here? --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 15:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | ''Robots in Disguise'' is not really a "continuity family" in the technical sense of the term as, to my knowledge, there's only one RID continuity. The one comic it got was also placed in its animated continuity, and all of the uses of its characters in ''Universe'' and the Fan Club ''Cybertron'' comic are also sprung from the cartoon's universe. How should we address that here? --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 15:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
: Continuity orphan? Vagabond? Widower? Bachelor? | : Continuity orphan? Vagabond? Widower? Bachelor? | ||
: In all seriousness, though, I think just plain "continuity" works well enough to distinguish it from the continuity families of G1 and UT. - [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] 20:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | : In all seriousness, though, I think just plain "continuity" works well enough to distinguish it from the continuity families of G1 and UT. - [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] 20:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
So, hey! Car Robots is retconned to be in G1 continuity in Japan, while Robots in Disguise remains its own! Eeep! We need to do some fixing here... --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 00:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Go-bots== | |||
:::Are we sure the Go-Bots aren't in BW continuity? I mean- Wreckers #4 and all. ( I know, non-published material does not count...) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 19:09, 17 October 2006 (PDT) | :::Are we sure the Go-Bots aren't in BW continuity? I mean- Wreckers #4 and all. ( I know, non-published material does not count...) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 19:09, 17 October 2006 (PDT) | ||
::::Pretty fucking damn sure, Derik. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 02:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | ::::Pretty fucking damn sure, Derik. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 02:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:40, 10 May 2007
RiD
Robots in Disguise is not really a "continuity family" in the technical sense of the term as, to my knowledge, there's only one RID continuity. The one comic it got was also placed in its animated continuity, and all of the uses of its characters in Universe and the Fan Club Cybertron comic are also sprung from the cartoon's universe. How should we address that here? --ItsWalky 15:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Continuity orphan? Vagabond? Widower? Bachelor?
- In all seriousness, though, I think just plain "continuity" works well enough to distinguish it from the continuity families of G1 and UT. - Dark T Zeratul 20:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
So, hey! Car Robots is retconned to be in G1 continuity in Japan, while Robots in Disguise remains its own! Eeep! We need to do some fixing here... --ItsWalky 00:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Go-bots
- It does seem like Hasbro might have flirted with the idea of making it BW/BM based given how many clear design references there were in the early designs, but it's definately its own thing/continuity as it was created. Look at the Wreckers thing as an Easter egg, like Cy-kill being in WWI ZacWilliam 02:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Where do you get information about Wreckers #4? I'd really like to know. The little bit here makes it seem like not much was known. Thanks! --Crockalley 03:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- At some point, Guido Guidi, Wreckers #4's artist, auctioned off the first four pages when 3H died, so we've got scans of those floating around. --ItsWalky 03:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Where do you get information about Wreckers #4? I'd really like to know. The little bit here makes it seem like not much was known. Thanks! --Crockalley 03:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
2007 Movie
We're considering the movie and all it's attended stuff it's own new continuity family yes/no? I mean there's a lot of G1 influence but it's also it's own thing (which you could say about every cf really). Just wondering if this page needed updating. --ZacWilliam 11:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, it's its own entity. - Dark T Zeratul 12:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

