Talk:BotCon 2006: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I think the Criticism and Nitpicks sections need to go, unless a certain criticism was brought up that was very prevalent and achieved noteworthy status. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 04:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | ::I think the Criticism and Nitpicks sections need to go, unless a certain criticism was brought up that was very prevalent and achieved noteworthy status. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 04:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Well, your guys' call, your Wiki. Go with what you think makes it best. [[User:Awa64|Awa64]] 05:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | Well, your guys' call, your Wiki. Go with what you think makes it best. [[User:Awa64|Awa64]] 05:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
I think the "Dinner" section needs a few dozen more uses of "significant". --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 08:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 08:01, 6 October 2006
I havn't read the convention comic but the entry here sounds awful biased and "review" like. I think it be better with less editorializing. Yes? ZacWilliam 12:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. --Suki Brits 12:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think the Criticism and Nitpicks sections need to go, unless a certain criticism was brought up that was very prevalent and achieved noteworthy status. --ItsWalky 04:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, your guys' call, your Wiki. Go with what you think makes it best. Awa64 05:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I think the "Dinner" section needs a few dozen more uses of "significant". --M Sipher 08:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
