Talk:BotCon 2006

I havn't read the convention comic but the entry here sounds awful biased and "review" like. I think it be better with less editorializing. Yes? ZacWilliam 12:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes. --Suki Brits 12:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I think the Criticism and Nitpicks sections need to go, unless a certain criticism was brought up that was very prevalent and achieved noteworthy status. --ItsWalky 04:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

If the Criticisms and Nitpitcks section are being obsolesced, can we replace it with a Fans Whined About... section? Whose content it a bullet-pointed list of THINGS, without editorial or argument?

(This is a serious suggestion.) -Derik 18:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, your guys' call, your Wiki. Go with what you think makes it best. Awa64 05:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

I think the "Dinner" section needs a few dozen more uses of "significant". --M Sipher 08:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm kind of new here so this may have been answered already, but what's the word on extreme profanity, like used in the picture description of this article? --UndeadScottsman 17:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Is EXTREEEME profanity like when you shout "VAGINA!" while skateboarding off a parachuting whale? --ItsWalky 18:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I take it then we're fine with leaving it? --UndeadScottsman 18:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Try to avoid it, unless it's hilarious. --Suki Brits 18:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I think that's our general rule of thumb. I don't think we should use it unnecessarily, and we should avoid it if it's avoidable, but we shouldn't shy away from it if it's there. Hey, if Michael Bay's gonna wear t-shirts with the f-bomb on them, then that makes it relevant, at the very least. --ItsWalky 19:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)