Talk:Kibble: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Jargon category== | ==Jargon category== | ||
I would really like there to be a category for fandom jargon, such as [[kibble]], [[shellformer]], and so on. I would just "be bold" (as they asy on Wikipedia), but I confess that I'm not sure what the best name for this category should be ("fan[dom] jargon"? "collector slang"??), nor what supercategory it would fit in. Anyone have suggestions? --[[User:64.109.166.197|64.109.166.197]] 20:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | I would really like there to be a category for fandom jargon, such as [[kibble]], [[shellformer]], and so on. I would just "be bold" (as they asy on Wikipedia), but I confess that I'm not sure what the best name for this category should be ("fan[dom] jargon"? "collector slang"??), nor what supercategory it would fit in. Anyone have suggestions? --[[User:64.109.166.197|64.109.166.197]] 20:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
:If memory serves, the low limit to category contents is just three, and we have well over three articles that could qualify. I'm generally opposed to overcategorization, but this idea would be a handy idea to decipher the meaning of some of those entries without having to actually read the article. | |||
:Not that people shouldn't read the articles.--[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 21:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 21:30, 27 October 2007
Would 'Undercarriage junk' fit in here?
Is it important enough to warrant a mention?
I mean, it DOES plague pretty much every jet Transformer to some degree.
Jargon category
I would really like there to be a category for fandom jargon, such as kibble, shellformer, and so on. I would just "be bold" (as they asy on Wikipedia), but I confess that I'm not sure what the best name for this category should be ("fan[dom] jargon"? "collector slang"??), nor what supercategory it would fit in. Anyone have suggestions? --64.109.166.197 20:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- If memory serves, the low limit to category contents is just three, and we have well over three articles that could qualify. I'm generally opposed to overcategorization, but this idea would be a handy idea to decipher the meaning of some of those entries without having to actually read the article.
- Not that people shouldn't read the articles.--Sntint 21:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
