Talk:X-Dimension Mini-Con: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Is there a flaw in my reasoning? --[[User:Giggidy|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy|talk]]) 14:09, 15 July 2015 (EDT) | Is there a flaw in my reasoning? --[[User:Giggidy|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy|talk]]) 14:09, 15 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
:This is an article that's about the actual toys, which were sold as the same characters and considered as such for ''more than a decade''. AVP's repurposing doesn't override that this is an article about a series of toys and the implicit fiction that existed long before it. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 15:22, 15 July 2015 (EDT) | :This is an article that's about the actual toys, which were sold as the same characters and considered as such for ''more than a decade''. AVP's repurposing doesn't override that this is an article about a series of toys and the implicit fiction that existed long before it. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 15:22, 15 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
::What the hell is "implicit fiction"? Are you saying we need an article about the fiction that's separate from the toys then to hold the relevant information?--[[User:Giggidy|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy|talk]]) 15:23, 15 July 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:23, 15 July 2015
From everything I've read, use in fiction is paramount to this wiki's POV. And we give first English name use priority to Japanese names. Plus, the gallery provides links to the original release, so you get all relevant info on the page.
Is there a flaw in my reasoning? --Giggidy (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2015 (EDT)
- This is an article that's about the actual toys, which were sold as the same characters and considered as such for more than a decade. AVP's repurposing doesn't override that this is an article about a series of toys and the implicit fiction that existed long before it. Saix (talk) 15:22, 15 July 2015 (EDT)
