Talk:Big Convoy (BW): Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Saix (talk | contribs)
IDW section: new section
Ascendron (talk | contribs)
Line 10: Line 10:


So the Sourcebook stuff really doesn't fit with the Predacus stuff. In particular, Magmatron is created ''after'' the Pax Cybertronia according to Predacus, but was supposedly defeated by Big Convoy prior to it according to the Sourcebook. How are we supposed to reconcile this? [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 14:21, 1 June 2016 (EDT)
So the Sourcebook stuff really doesn't fit with the Predacus stuff. In particular, Magmatron is created ''after'' the Pax Cybertronia according to Predacus, but was supposedly defeated by Big Convoy prior to it according to the Sourcebook. How are we supposed to reconcile this? [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 14:21, 1 June 2016 (EDT)
:Well, it's not really our job to reconcile anything. If it really impedes the readability of our article, we should just put up a note pointing out that one account contradicts another. --[[User:Ascendron|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron|talk]]) 14:37, 1 June 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:37, 1 June 2016

I sure as hell never heard anyone call him "Maximus Prime". Besides, "Optimus Primeval" is better anyway. --M Sipher 08:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

  • The only Maximus Prime I know of is the dude who used to mod at Seibertron. I don't think it's that widely spread a term among the fandom. --DrSpengler 16:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Additionally, using "Maximus Prime" makes it kinda hard for people to know what the fuck you're talking about. Interrobang 16:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I came up with a name for him and realy like it Gigantus prime like gigantic and Optimus prime

IDW section

So the Sourcebook stuff really doesn't fit with the Predacus stuff. In particular, Magmatron is created after the Pax Cybertronia according to Predacus, but was supposedly defeated by Big Convoy prior to it according to the Sourcebook. How are we supposed to reconcile this? Saix (talk) 14:21, 1 June 2016 (EDT)

Well, it's not really our job to reconcile anything. If it really impedes the readability of our article, we should just put up a note pointing out that one account contradicts another. --Ascendron (talk) 14:37, 1 June 2016 (EDT)