Talk:Shellformer: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
→Under-3: new section |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Should Voyager-Class [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] be added? [[User:Inkblot|Inkblot]] 09:45, 10 December 2011 (EST) | Should Voyager-Class [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] be added? [[User:Inkblot|Inkblot]] 09:45, 10 December 2011 (EST) | ||
== Under-3 == | |||
Seriously... the ultimate shellformer. Right?--[[User:Nevermore|Nevermore]] ([[User talk:Nevermore|talk]]) 06:04, 19 July 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:04, 19 July 2016
Almost always alternate form which unpeels... in what case does the robot unpeel?
I'd suggest G1 Scourge as probable earliest use of this type of design.
87.127.199.145 20:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm interested in any "reverse-shellformer" examples as well. Anyone? Can we remove that modifier until an example comes along? Buttbutt 00:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, maybe G1 Ultra Magnus or RID Prime? --MistaTee 02:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Slumblebee is both a shellformer and a reverse-shellformer. - Starfield 14:23, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
Should we mention Grimlock, Slag, and Sludge in the article? They do use shellforming to an extent. ZeldaTheSwordsman 21:29, 27 April 2010 (EDT)
- That is not shellformering. That's just kibble. --ItsWalky 21:41, 27 April 2010 (EDT)
Should Voyager-Class Sentinel Prime (ROTF) be added? Inkblot 09:45, 10 December 2011 (EST)
Under-3
Seriously... the ultimate shellformer. Right?--Nevermore (talk) 06:04, 19 July 2016 (EDT)
