User talk:Giggidy/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT) | Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
:I dunno, I think the fact that it has been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so. | :I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 11 September 2016
Is this too much? I never know. Comments, edits, whatever, all welcome.--Giggidy (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
- We-ell, Year of the Monkey Optimus Primal did have a BW20 logo on... --Riptide (talk) 20:05, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
Snap! Jalaguy (talk) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, if that. --M Sipher (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
- I dunno, I think the fact that it has been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --Riptide (talk) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
