Talk:Jack Tracker: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm struggling for a reason to not take out the bottom two disambig templates, make a Notes section talking about the name oddity then making "see also" links to the disambig pages for the tertiary names because those stacked templates for tertiary names look goddamn awful. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 05:43, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | I'm struggling for a reason to not take out the bottom two disambig templates, make a Notes section talking about the name oddity then making "see also" links to the disambig pages for the tertiary names because those stacked templates for tertiary names look goddamn awful. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 05:43, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
:I'd say do it.--[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 09:39, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | :I'd say do it.--[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 09:39, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
::I looked at disambiguation templates, trying to take a crack at something like DisambigM which would take multiple arguments, but I couldn't make sense of it. --[[User:Giggidy|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy|talk]]) 11:35, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:35, 28 October 2016
I'm struggling for a reason to not take out the bottom two disambig templates, make a Notes section talking about the name oddity then making "see also" links to the disambig pages for the tertiary names because those stacked templates for tertiary names look goddamn awful. --M Sipher (talk) 05:43, 28 October 2016 (EDT)
