Talk:Vigilem: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Given what we know about Vigilem in the new issue, do we transfer most of Carcer's data onto this page or not? [[User:Jcbynum1|Jcbynum1]] ([[User talk:Jcbynum1|talk]]) 23:32, 8 February 2017 (EST) | Given what we know about Vigilem in the new issue, do we transfer most of Carcer's data onto this page or not? [[User:Jcbynum1|Jcbynum1]] ([[User talk:Jcbynum1|talk]]) 23:32, 8 February 2017 (EST) | ||
: We could probably stand to wait until we know more. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky|talk]]) 23:45, 8 February 2017 (EST) | : We could probably stand to wait until we know more. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky|talk]]) 23:45, 8 February 2017 (EST) | ||
: Can everyone just like, squash down the boner to move every page at the slightest hint of change while ignoring that the ongoing fiction is very likely going to reveal more unexpected mysteries that might make huge moves really pointless like it has done repeatedly in the past? Maybe? Perhaps? --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 13:59, 9 February 2017 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:59, 9 February 2017
Carcer
Given what we know about Vigilem in the new issue, do we transfer most of Carcer's data onto this page or not? Jcbynum1 (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2017 (EST)
- We could probably stand to wait until we know more. --ItsWalky (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2017 (EST)
- Can everyone just like, squash down the boner to move every page at the slightest hint of change while ignoring that the ongoing fiction is very likely going to reveal more unexpected mysteries that might make huge moves really pointless like it has done repeatedly in the past? Maybe? Perhaps? --M Sipher (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2017 (EST)
