User talk:ShootingStar7X: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "I have a sneaking suspicion that Ravenspar might be female. From the feminine-sounding name to the svelte mold used, I wouldn't say it's too unlikely. Of course, we'd need..." |
→Retools: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have a sneaking suspicion that [[Ravenspar]] might be female. From the feminine-sounding name to the svelte mold used, I wouldn't say it's too unlikely. Of course, we'd need to ask Hasbro (or wait until we can [[ask Vector Prime]] again) in order to know for sure. [[User:ShootingStar7X|ShootingStar7X]] ([[User talk:ShootingStar7X|talk]]) 21:30, 1 December 2017 (EST) | I have a sneaking suspicion that [[Ravenspar]] might be female. From the feminine-sounding name to the svelte mold used, I wouldn't say it's too unlikely. Of course, we'd need to ask Hasbro (or wait until we can [[ask Vector Prime]] again) in order to know for sure. [[User:ShootingStar7X|ShootingStar7X]] ([[User talk:ShootingStar7X|talk]]) 21:30, 1 December 2017 (EST) | ||
== Retools == | |||
ANY change to the mold, no matter how minor, is a retool. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 12:51, 3 December 2017 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 17:51, 3 December 2017
I have a sneaking suspicion that Ravenspar might be female. From the feminine-sounding name to the svelte mold used, I wouldn't say it's too unlikely. Of course, we'd need to ask Hasbro (or wait until we can ask Vector Prime again) in order to know for sure. ShootingStar7X (talk) 21:30, 1 December 2017 (EST)
Retools
ANY change to the mold, no matter how minor, is a retool. --Khajidha (talk) 12:51, 3 December 2017 (EST)
