User talk:ShootingStar7X
{{#if: SGRavage-EvanGauntt.jpg |
{{ #if: Hi, ShootingStar7X! Welcome aboard! |Hi, ShootingStar7X! Welcome aboard! {{#if: ||}}
|}} Welcome to TFWiki.net, one of the foremost resources on all things Transformers! If you're new, we recommend you read through our help documentation before you start editing. Here's some links to specific areas of interest:
This will help you understand how TFWiki.net works, and help ease you into our odd little place. Once you feel you're accustomed, feel free to remove this message!
{{ #if: |{{ #if: | | |
{{#ifeq: User talk||}}{{#ifeq: User talk|File|}}
-west james/notirishman (talk) 17:03, 4 December 2017 (EST)
Retools
[edit]ANY change to the mold, no matter how minor, is a retool. --Khajidha (talk) 12:51, 3 December 2017 (EST)
- Yeah, but for nosecone-blunting retools, this wiki usually just describes them as redecos, then mentions that their nosecones have been rounded for safety reasons. ShootingStar7X (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2017 (EST)
- Can you include another example? notirishman (talk) 16:37, 4 December 2017 (EST)
- Airazor had his nosecone rounded from his base mold (same thing happened with Air Raid), which the wiki mentions is a retool—but they still describe the figure as a redeco. ShootingStar7X (talk) 09:43, 5 December 2017 (EST)
- Hmm, well time to make some changes. notirishman (talk) 13:52, 5 December 2017 (EST)
- Actually, I think we should leave it the way it is now. notirishman (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2017 (EST)
- I agree. Nosecone-rounding is just to make a figure safer, and not really notable enough to count as a retool. To me, changes to the aesthetics and engineering of a mold, as well as design flaw fixes, count as retools.ShootingStar7X (talk) 20:57, 18 December 2017 (EST)
- Actually, I think we should leave it the way it is now. notirishman (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2017 (EST)
- Hmm, well time to make some changes. notirishman (talk) 13:52, 5 December 2017 (EST)
- Airazor had his nosecone rounded from his base mold (same thing happened with Air Raid), which the wiki mentions is a retool—but they still describe the figure as a redeco. ShootingStar7X (talk) 09:43, 5 December 2017 (EST)
- Can you include another example? notirishman (talk) 16:37, 4 December 2017 (EST)
Cyberverse Slipstream
[edit]I know this kinda goes against the rules for talk pages not being a discussion board, but I must ask, did you draw the picture you accidently uploaded for CV Slipstream? notirishman (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2018 (EDT)
- No, I downloaded it here when I was looking for a reference on drawing faces. When I wanted to upload the CV Slipstream image, I only remembered that it started with a "0", and uploaded the first image in my Documents folder that started with 0. The preview image while uploading a file didn't show up, so I was completely unaware that I uploaded the wrong image. Oops. ShootingStar7X (talk) 21:04, 1 August 2018 (EDT)
- Well, happens to the best of us. notirishman (talk) 21:17, 1 August 2018 (EDT)
- Okay then. ShootingStar7X (talk) 21:19, 1 August 2018 (EDT)
- Well, happens to the best of us. notirishman (talk) 21:17, 1 August 2018 (EDT)
Capitalization in context
[edit]"Combiner" is capitalized by Hasbro in Generations product descriptions, presumably for marketing reasons. Ergo, we should follow context when a page utilizes only 1 or 2 continuities, should we not? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 19:32, 27 September 2018 (EDT)
- Considering that we don't capitalize the word "combiner" for the pages of Generations-original combiners Ultra Prime and Galvatronus, I suggest not capitalizing "combiner" for the PotP combiners, for the sake of consistency. ShootingStar7X (talk) 22:36, September 27, 2018 (EST)
