User talk:68.1.164.228

Dude, you're the one vandalizing. This wiki accepts humor and that's an accepted and liked part of the entry. Stop taking it out without talking about it on the talk page.

User: sorry i just have a thing for accuracy. and also people who may need certian articles that are inaccurate.

... what? --M Sipher 22:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Assuming you're the same guy who 'edited' the article before by cutting out 80% of the content you found 'too funny' and not writing anything to replace it... (And you seem to be)

1. Get bent.
2. Articles on this wiki are suppsoed to be written 'in universe', similar to tech-specs. You broke the forth wall.
3. You, an unregistered user, overrode several registered users (myself included) who revered your changes with notes in the history indicating why they are inappropriate. Registered users can be (and are) banned for inappropriate edits, so if you see several of them disagreeing with what you're doing chances are they're not the ones in the wrong.
4. You vented your displeasure at being overriden by adding, in the article itself: "whoever that duochebag is that keeps adding things in this part stop fucking around with teletraan 1. oh and your not funny one bit."
   1. You're wrong.
   2. That belongs on the talk page, not the article itself.
   3. You used profanity while doing so.
   4. You ignored the reverts- and the memos why- and then vandalized the page because you were pissed off about it instead of taking it to the discussion page.
   5. It's "you're," not "your."
   6. Most heinous of all- you mis-capitalized it. why do you want to make the article text ugly?
5. The Funny stays. We had a meeting an' everything.

Now I want you to think about what you've done, and write three paragraphs about why it was wrong and how you'll do better in the future. -Derik 22:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

user:first off i did not use any inappropriate text at all. second, the person who did the aticle about the 2007 bonecrusher wasnt being funny, just being retarded because thats not funny one bit. so i suggest you make your articles more appropriate information and double check it so it is accurate. if anyone wwants to be a mindless retard and wants to be funny, go to uncyclopedia. or better yet make your own wiki where you can have mindless useless information.

Look, even though we have humor in our articles, all of our information is accurate (with the possible exception of the image captions, but on a page about Movie Bonecrusher, that pic would obviously be Bonecrusher). Also, the jokes about Bonecrusher hating everything are based on his tech specs, which start out, and I quote "Bonecrusher hates everything." Plus, many of the jokes were put in by Teletraan I's admins User:ItsWalky and User:Suki Brits. Finally, many characters who we don't know much about get funny "filler" articles, much like older versions of Movie Bumblebee's page. --FortMax 17:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I find it amusing that people are so infuriated by this wiki's tone. Maybe they should take their little robot cartoon a little less seriously. Its a hobby, not our lives. --FFN 17:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

user: ok then. i do like this website because there is alot of info so maybe i'll become a registered helper. plus i know alot about bonecrusher too and some of the other characters.

so can you please un-ban my IP then so i can join and create an account please?

From Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki, a Wikia wiki.