Talk:Power Pro-kun: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Cyberlink420 (talk | contribs) →"Powa" or "Power": new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* If we're going to be beholden to the Japanese name, it should be "Pawapuro-kun". "Power Pro-kun" is a weird half-step that straddles the line between the two interpretations and ultimately serves no one. | * If we're going to be beholden to the Japanese name, it should be "Pawapuro-kun". "Power Pro-kun" is a weird half-step that straddles the line between the two interpretations and ultimately serves no one. | ||
In short, Power Pro-Kun is the name that makes the most sense in all respects. -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 02:06, 6 April 2019 (EDT) | In short, Power Pro-Kun is the name that makes the most sense in all respects. -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 02:06, 6 April 2019 (EDT) | ||
:Power Pro-kun. "Powa" is stupid "Rokkuman" horsepucky. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 02:28, 6 April 2019 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:28, 6 April 2019
"Powa" or "Power"
Here's my argument:
- If you put "パワ" into literally any translation software, it comes out as "power", not "pawa".
- The name is an abbreviated version of "パワフルプロ" ("Pawafurupuro"), a transliterated version of "powerful pro". Remove the "フル" (furu), and you get "パワプロ" (Pawapuro). Removing the "ful" from "powerful" doesn't remove the R; it's intended to be there because it's a transliteration of an English word. And they're not going to add an extra character because that defeats the purpose of abbreviating it, but the intention is still there.
- Konami's official translation of "パワプロ" is "Power Pro".
- If we're going to be beholden to the Japanese name, it should be "Pawapuro-kun". "Power Pro-kun" is a weird half-step that straddles the line between the two interpretations and ultimately serves no one.
In short, Power Pro-Kun is the name that makes the most sense in all respects. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 02:06, 6 April 2019 (EDT)

