User talk:Cyberlink420

Previous discussions

Previous discussions can be found at Archive. However, please do not edit the Archive page.

Editing Pages

I see you have taken out one of my edits in the Starscream tfp page.... was that edit irrelevant or something? LittleAutobot1218 12:23, 13 February 2020 (EST)

More or less. The edit didn't really add anything of substance to the article, and it had both grammar and formatting issues. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 12:36, 13 February 2020 (EST)

Sorry... I didn't really know about that LittleAutobot1218 8:57, 2 20 February 2020 (EST)

"Unidentified character"

Yeah let’s just say Blurr was unidentified by me. But if u say it is Blurr i’ll take you from your word. Btw I don’t know who Blurr is —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Octane (talk • contribs).

"Red Five" (Cyberverse)

I thought that too, but I also thought that the way he was part of the group that was otherwise made up of named characters, his prominent red colouring and the fact he was the first one to be "shot down" as part of the diversion was a reference to the Redshirt trope, which then became playing with the trope because he didn't actually die.

I have to admit that as soon as I saw the guy, I thought, "A red generic? Oh, no. The poor doomed bastard." And then when his shuttle blew up first...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by WM-R (talk • contribs).

Didn't they confirm that the Bumblebee movie is a reboot?

It's what I read. Apparently,it was announced at the New York Toy Fair 2019 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ‎Thetransformersmorethanmeetstheeye (talk • contribs).

Already discussed here. The upshot is that the announcement was vague marketing speak but that actual released products link the BB movie to the previous ones. Basically, the announcement was Hasbro's way of saying "we know the old movies sucked, we promise future ones will be better" without actually insulting their own prior product. --Khajidha (talk) 10:35, 15 November 2019 (EST)

Removing Periods

So I am really sorry for doing this I was at work and was working on this and left my computer open when i went to a meeting and one of my coworkers must of messed with it.--Oldmajor (talk) 11:46, 14 January 2020 (EST)

Phil LaMarr

Your right, I know I shouldn't be reverting back and fourth with occupations, I apologize for that. I just couldn't make up my mind to agree on if he's notable for being a comedian or not, because he did work on MadTV. But like I said before, I'm really sorry. MarioKartFan9 (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2020 (EST)

Creating a page

I wanted to add a page regarding Outright Games due to their role in publishing Transformers: Battlegrounds and I wanted to ask if it was okay to add the page before the game has been released or not. If so and the game is cancelled, I'm willing to delete it afterwards. -- DKSlayer64 13:21, 12 June 2020 (EDT)

There's no reason why not, though I would recommend looking at some other game company articles on the wiki as examples so you get an idea of how to properly format the article. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2020 (EDT)

On 3A/ThreeA/ThreeZero

Considering that the line of ThreeZero and its figures, I wanted to ask if we should consider adding the figures that are being made by the company under the corresponding characters' Merchandise pages, if possible. -- DKSlayer64 (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2020 (EDT)

It's an officially-licensed product, so yeah, it should probably on there. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2020 (EDT)

rba

Did u watch the decepticon episode More than meets the eye of rescue bots academy and if so. how?Freakertron (talk) 03:38, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

It aired in the UK; it's floating out there if you know where to look. (and no, I won't say where) -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

Continuity Notes

How are Continuity Notes defined? What are some examples? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 96megatron (talk • contribs).

Intentional callbacks and references to past events, not just vague connections. For example, using a macguffin obtained in the last movie or a character specifically mentioning something that happened in a previous movie would constitute a continuity note. A list of new characters or "character uses a weapon they've used in every other movie" is not, nor is just a list of film plot points. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:28, 2 August 2020 (EDT)

Thank you for taking the time for the response. Are there any of these bullet points that can be kept? −

• This film reveals the existence of ‘The Creators’, a mysterious race of aliens responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs and creating our titular transforming robotic aliens, or at least their elemental metal. Originally it was believed the Allspark was the sole progenitor of the race of ‘Transformers’. How 'the Allspark' and ‘The Creators’ are connected remains to be told.
• Sometime after the 'Battle for Chicago', the U.S. has provided the company, Kinetic Solutions Incorporated, with the collected Decepticons’ remains and their abandoned technology for research. However, during the massive clean up some of the technology was stolen by quite a hefty amount of people, not associated with the U.S. government. Even ending up in the hands of those both within and outside of the United States, the Russians have even started a bidding war.
• Following the disbanding of NEST, a new paramilitary unit, called Cemetery Wind was formed, composed of just humans, some who’ve lost families in the Battle of Chicago, and is headed by Harold Attinger, tasked with dealing with the remaining Decepticons forces. Although some of Earth’s government officials are under the assumption that the Autobots are still assisting in efforts to put an end to the remaining Decepticons threat.
• Brains, last seen in the previous film going down with the Decepticon mothership, alongside Wheelie, leaving his fate ambiguous is revealed to still be alive (albeit without one of his legs attached, using it as a makeshift cane). Wheelie's fate was something that was still unknown, until his reappearance in the following film, The Last Knight.
• Sometime after the final battle of Dark of the Moon, Optimus had his arm reattached, after being removed by Sentinel Prime during their final fight, presumably by Ratchet, our best offscreen medic.
• In the KSI lab, among the spoils of war, are the heads of Sentinel Prime and Megatron, provided through government contracts.
• Established in the first film, Optimus Prime has held a no-harming-or-killing-humans rule (although his Autobots don't always follow that rule), the betrayal and subsequent hunting of his kind by the humans challenges Optimus' one rule.

--96megatron

Marked the ones that shouldn't be brought back; the remaining ones could stand to be rewritten to be more concise. (Also, just type four ~ to sign your posts.) -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 22:16, 2 August 2020 (EDT)

Creating a page for the Activators

Having noticed your edits to my edits to the Mini-Con page, I decided to put forth the idea that the Activator Mini-Cons should possibly be given their own page, considering that the Weaponizer Mini-Cons from the same series have one of their own. It would serve the purpose of lessening the amount of links and text in that section, and makes a certain amount of sense given, again, the Weaponizer Mini-Cons have a page of their own for a similar purpose. -- ZodiacLegacy911 (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2020 (EDT)

Robots In Disguise reprint

Okay i can understand your other edits and respect but why did you delete the link that proved it was out?--Projectus (talk) 22:38, 13 August 2020 (EDT)

Because we generally don't put purchase links in the reprint sections. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 23:00, 13 August 2020 (EDT)

Someone did it for volume 1. Granted, you just use the word generally, but still don't you think they need some proof to show that their is a second volume and not fake as hell. If you have another option, I'm all ears.--Projectus (talk) 23:57, 13 August 2020 (EDT)

Put the link in the edit description when you add it. Also, none of those Volume 1 links actually go to the respective store listings. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 00:24, 14 August 2020 (EDT)

SG Movie Optimus

I used a version of that photo with a clear background to use as the main picture of this page but do you think the old one is still better for the merchandise section? Perhaps I should use the picture of SG Optimus carrying the Ion Blaster as the main picture and use the old picture in the merchandise section, since that old picture did show all the accessories and the full figure.--Primestar3 (talk) 19:55, 17 August 2020 (EDT)

Sentinel Prime is not Zeta Prime

If we have to apply what "Hasbro" says, then we should apply what Transformers DOTM's script says. You see, in this script, Sentinel Prime united the cybertronian tribes. In fact, Nova Prime from G1 did it. So, if I use your way, then we should call it Sentinel Nova Prime.

Again, it makes no sense. Even if Hasbro says the "full name" of Zeta Prime, it appears that the character is only called Zeta Prime in the final work. You cannot imagine a new character called "Sentinel Zeta Prime" just for one quote from Hasbro.

What about Hasbro ? Check discussions about the project WFC, everyone asked Hasbro with this question : "Are we going to get Sentinel or Zeta or both ?". Hasbro finally answered "Zeta Prime" with a picture of the character. They didn't say "Sentinel Zeta Prime".

If you want to add the truth in this page, then rename it Zeta Prime (WFC) or delete it once and for all.

Zeta Prime has nothing to do with Alpha Trion. This page is full of lies. Sentinel Prime is the PREDECESSOR of Zeta Prime. Sentinel Prime had the matrix. Zeta Prime didn't get the matrix.

Even Exodus proved they weren't the same character about the belt.

Like it or not, they will never be the same character. The truth speaks. -- TransformersFan00 (talk) 10:14, 26 August 2020 (EDT)

Well clearly you haven't read any of the fucking novels, because A: Sentinel Prime does not have the Matrix in Exodus, and B: He's called Sentinel Zeta Prime multiple times in the Covenant of Primus. But please, do go on about your "truth" that can be easily disproven by, you know, actually knowing what happened. Escargon (talk) 10:34, 26 August 2020 (EDT)

Again, go watch the G1, the ORIGINAL Transformers and the cartoon of 2005. Sentinel and Zeta are not the same character. Plus not the same skin appeareance AT ALL. You misinterpret everything. Go bring your "proofs" and it will be EASY to disprove them. Hasbro has already contradicted itself. Come with more of your "proofs" and contradictions. You talk about Exodus ? Don't you see the belt ? Your "Sentinel Zeta Prime" is so unrealistic for Sentinel is the mentor of Optimus WHEREAS Zeta is not the mentor of Optimus. You could say Sentinel and Zeta are the predecessors of Optimus, but then so are Alpha, Nominus and Nova. So then, Sentinel Zeta Alpha Nova Nominus Prime is the predecessor of Optimus. You are completely out of the reality. -- TransformersFan00 (talk) 10:44, 26 August 2020 (EDT)

G1 and the movies have nothing to do with one another, nor do they have anything to do with WFC. I don't think you understand how continuities, reboots, and reusing names for trademark purposes works. I'd hate to have to see you try to reconcile Ironhide, Ironhide and Ironhide. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2020 (EDT)

This is hypocritical. You talk about continuity but the page says "Sentinel Zeta Prime" fought against the Quintessons and was close to Alpha Trion. Don't you see this come from G1 ???? In this case, it is Sentinel Prime, not Zeta Prime. So think before you speak. If we truly apply your false point of view, then we should call this character Sentinel Nova Nominus Zeta Prime.

So uncivilised. --TransformersFan00 (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2020 (EDT)

So what I'm getting from this is that you don't understand that WFC takes place in a different universe than G1. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 11:30, 26 August 2020 (EDT)

And the moral of today's story: don't be dumb. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 11:34, 26 August 2020 (EDT)

Darkside Optimus Prime

The image i put us Darkside Optimus Prime according to the source I found viva video and is confirmed to be Darkside Optimus Prime in a G1 body but I don’t know where it originated and reverse search hasn’t help at all so it will be an stub here —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nelspeedracer (talk • contribs).

You're going to have to be more specific. How can you be certain it's Darkside Optimus Prime and not Nemesis Prime? Heck, if you don't even know where it's from, it shouldn't be on the wiki in the first place. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 18:10, 1 September 2020 (EDT)

That’s Nemesis Prime from the All Spark manga. Escargon (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2020 (EDT)

My bad I’ll have Darkside Optimus Prime into Nemesis Prime then

Welcome to the wiki, but please remember that you have a "Preview" button. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2017 (EDT)

Don't add pages for comics that aren't out yet. Escargon (talk) 19:59, 17 October 2018 (EDT)

My honestly

I am a fan of Transformers and I don't troll or scam in any mean way, I love Transformers. I try to add unique articles that aren't here. I'm working on however my pictures for it keeps getting deleted so give me 6 hours or something don't delete it. I work hard on those articles.

Q/n/A

The concept of such an article has been discussed by the userbase in the past, and the idea was thoroughly decided against. You could literally spend an eternity document every cameo or reference to Transformers in all of human media. Unless it's particularly notable somehow, we only concern ourselves with licensed works. Jalaguy (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2017 (EST).

Copy-pasting into articles

Your edits have been reverted multiple times now for copy-pasting unformatted FTF bios/stats directly into articles. Copy-pasting isn't acceptable, and the wiki isn't a video game strategy guide. You haven't been directly warned about it on your talk page before, so I'll let it slide once more, but do it again and you'll be looking at a block. Jalaguy (talk) 19:43, 22 December 2017 (EST)

Warning

Your Star Trek pages have been repeatedly deleted for being not up to standards, redundant with existing articles, for comics that aren't even out yet, etc. Please stop, as simply re-doing these things without change will only result in a time-out. --M Sipher (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2018 (EDT)

Using the preview button

You are getting closer to functional editing behaviour, but you still need to make use of the preview button to check your coding results before saving. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 19:34, 27 April 2020 (EDT)

Trial and Error

While the story was written by official Transformers writers, and is very good, it was not approved or licensed by Hasbro and is thus unofficial. While we don't cover it, there is an unofficial "wiki-style" page for it: see here. --Riptide (talk) 20:06, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

Why Trails and Error got deleted yet The Return of Blurr, The Stunti-Con Job, and Trial of Megatron, Part 1 do not? It makess no sense that Trails and Error get deleted yet those three stay and got their wikis? You're using your own words against yourself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nelspeedracer (talk • contribs).

Because BotCon was an official Transformers convention, so stories told there are included; TFNation is unofficial. And Trial of Megatron is a special case because it was an actual episode that was planned for release before Animated was cancelled. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:13, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

We're all aware of Trial and Error, and it's great. But it's not an official comic. TFWiki only covers material officially sanctioned by Hasbro and Takara. And in a convention sense, that means only comics and fiction released through BotCon. TFNation isn't a Hasbro-sponsored event, so anything released there is outside of our purview. However, someone on Tumblr already did lengthy TFWiki-style annotations for the comic; you can find those at this page. In the future, please don't create articles for unofficial material. Thanks! -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

Alignment seems to be precedent, though.... --Thylacine 2000 (talk) 12:18, 19 May 2020 (EDT)

Alignment is written by the author to actively follow on from things he set up in his work, and has since influenced several pieces of Transformers media, with concepts and ideas from it being incorporated into canon. Trial and Error is the work of two fans of the series using ideas from what we know of Season 4, but giving it a unique twist, and in any case, actively contradicts what we know from Trial of Megatron. Escargon (talk) 12:24, 19 May 2020 (EDT)

But aren't The Return of Blurr and {The Stunti-Con Job]] "unofficial" too? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nelspeedracer (talk • contribs).

No. Like I said, anything released at BotCon is official because it was an event officially sponsored by Hasbro. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:16, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

Then why do Trial of Megatron stay and Trial and Error do not? Usertalk:Nelspeedracer

Because Trial of Megatron was an actual episode that was planned to be made before the show was cancelled. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:22, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

Ok I get it now it was kinda confusing with material outside of mainstream and comics would have fallen under in like conventions and tie in material (talk)

Great. Also, type four tildes (~~~~) to automatically sign your posts! -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:32, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

OK Nelspeedracer (talk) 08:33, 19 May 2020 (EDT)

Unknown TFcon Story

I found this story and it’s an TFcon story so mind helping me identifying it and maybe give it an Wiki if not made: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm6Zy7yEh9Y {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

It's not canon. Escargon (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2020 (EDT)

What makes it not cannon? Doesn’t certain TFcon performances considered to me cannon or take place in its own universe at least? It’s voiced by official voice actors and wouldn’t it make it an pseudocanon or something like it? I see other similar ones said by admins it wasn’t cannon and they debated with other admins and eventually agreed the it was an pseudocanon or Apocrypha but you get the idea {Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

Because there's no involvement from Hasbro whatsoever in these TFCon scripts. What's listed under pseudocanon and apocrypha are ideas that were at some point or another under development at Hasbro such as the unpublished Dreamwave issues, or, in the case of Alignment, were works by official authors that directly carried on from the official works they wrote that were published. The script from TFCon is neither of those. Escargon (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2020 (EDT)

Then why was David Kaye and Garry Chalk doing there anyways? {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

Because they were guests at the convention, which is fan-run, as opposed to the script readings we had from BotCon, which had Hasbro's backing at the time. Escargon (talk) 23:19, 29 May 2020 (EDT)

No fiction from TFCon is canon (one N, not two) because TFCon is not an official Transformers convention supported by Hasbro in any licensed capacity. BotCon was, but it's not anymore. At present, the only convention that has Hasbro's official license to produce canon Transformers fiction is HasCon, but which has only ever had one year of activity, which was back in 2017.

As for past Transformers actors attending unofficial Transformers conventions, such as your bringing up David Kaye and Garry Chalk attending TFCon as guests, those actors can do that because they as human beings are not property owned by Hasbro. They also do lots of other work as actors appearing in non-Transformers series as well, and as such have also made appearances at many other non-Transformers conventions, like all of the various Comic Cons throughout the world.

But, no matter what kinds of fiction all of these conventions may produce, none of them are canon to Transformers unless they are produced by a convention that is officially licensed by Hasbro. And, as I said, HasCon is presently the only convention that is officially licensed to produce canon Transformers fiction, but has thus far had no activity since 2017.

Hope that clears up yours questions about the current state of officially-licensed Transformers convention fiction. --Sabrblade (talk) 23:56, 29 May 2020 (EDT)

Shattered Glass Animated Blurr and Shockwave

• I found the pictures of Shattered Glass Blurr and Shockwave in Re-burn of Blurr short {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

You should split them into separate images. Put Blurr's on Blurr's and Shockwave's on Shockwave's. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 01:50, 20 June 2020 (EDT)

Tag your pics

• If you upload an image, please add it to the appropriate category or categories. For an example, see how I tagged your previous SG Blurr and Shockwave image. Prime Radiant (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2020 (EDT)
  • The category button somehow doesn’t work for me when I try to use it I get nothing. Is the button broken or something? {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

Check out the image policy for some tips and / or look at how other images have been categorized. I added the tags manually to your previous image. Prime Radiant (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2020 (EDT)

How did Roller were able to gain an robot mode in United Warriors?

I’ve been questioning on how Roller gained an robot mode in the manga of United Warriors without an explanation what so ever? Can someone explain to me how Roller were able to gain an robot mode and why he hasn’t used it before?{{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

Unicron reformatted him, same as turning Megatron to Galvatron. Escargon (talk) 13:31, 20 June 2020 (EDT)

Implied where in the manga?{{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

...Did you actually read the manga? It's shown there that Unicron pulls them through other dimensions and gives them new bodies. Escargon (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

Yes I did but the dialogue was in Japanese so it made difficult to understand as I had an hard time finding english copies {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

Any possible QnA replacement or revival of Ask Vector Prime?

Will an official Ask Vector Prime have some kind of official successor because I got serous questions on Animated {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

1: no

2: You will likely never get the answers you're looking for. Escargon (talk) 01:11, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

Whelpin the words of Scroponok “We shall see... we shall see” because I wonder if the Sailor Starlights and Kakyuu exists within Transformers Animated after I read Transformers Animated: The AllSpark Almanac II and being an Sailor Moon fan too I wondered If they exist in that universe so until another official QnA is set up “We shall see... we shall see” {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

Literally all of those planets from other series that were seen in the Almanacs' star maps were thrown in there as mere Easter eggs because Jim Sorenson (one of the books' authors) is the kind of super-awesome nerd who habitually litters his works with those kinds of external-media references that tend to be little more than just fun nods for nerds like us to look for and enjoy. They don't mean anything deeper than that. Kinmoku's inclusion was just another one of those neat Easter eggs, and only means that there is a planet with that name in the Animated universe but which doesn't mean it's the same Kinmoku from Sailor Moon. --Sabrblade (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

Yeah although maybe an Ask Vector Prime or something sort of QnA might confirm whether or not the characters and its inhabitants exist within the Animated’s universe but in the words of Scroponok “We shall see... we shall see...” {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

Speaking as a big fan of Sailor Moon myself, that honestly sounds more like the kinds of questions that either would have been ignored, given some kind of non-answer, or given a joke answer from Sideways of "Sure, why not?". Besides, it's not anything could be done, officially, with the SM characters outside of Naoko Takeuchi's permission, anyway, since she holds a tight grip on that series. In other words, it's just a name. We needn't think anything more of it than that. (Also, it was Lord Zarak who said that, not Scorponok.) --Sabrblade (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

Yeah but Ask Vector Prime have slipped non-Transformers characters that Habro didn't have the rights to like they had [Circuit Breaker] mentioned to be part of Alternate version of [Society of Ultimate Villainy|S.U.V] from said Animated Universe or how [Khyber] was mentioned to visit an Malgus universe to get Grimlock's sword and Lockdown's hook so if Vector Prime was able to mentioned those two characters without problems then he can do the same with Sailor Moon characters although he would probably wouldn't have them fully explain their complete involvement like I except Vector Prime to say something like "Versions of those characters may have existed within that universe although their involvement with Cybertronians are unknown" or something like that as Vector Prime did not explain the events of how Khyber got Grimlock's sword and Lockdown's hook so he'll probably confirm they exist in there with minimum detail of their whereabouts and say something that has to do with complicated spacetime stuff like he could say the events of time travel in Sailor Moon has influenced the Malgus universe of Animated or say they don't exist and say it was pure coincidence or what you said but again they did sneak Circuit Breaker and Khyber in so maybe they'll probably do the same with the Sailor Starlights and Kakyuu if they exist in Animated or not. Although Transformers is crossovering nearly every major series recently Transformers vs Terminator including some Japanese series like Evangelion, Mazinger Z so I wouldn't be surprised if they did an Sailor Moon crossover {{Nelspeedracer (talk)}}

--M Sipher (talk) 18:59, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

Yeah I don’t know how to sign up on those sites at all and more into mobile app social media but ok

Lil Formers

First off, what magazine issue was this in? You've left no storylinks, and as far as I remember from what little I paid attention to it, that Lil Formers strip was never published in the Collectors' Club magazine. Escargon (talk) 14:33, 29 August 2020 (EDT)

I had it but my tabs crashed and lost it so keep it up until I can find it again ok?

...No. You find it first, and then it can be re-added. Escargon (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2020 (EDT)

Volcanicus

Seriously, stop adding stuff to the pages. You have demonstrated you do not understand Japanese, and continue to add incorrect information based off of your readings of the artwork. This is not helpful. Escargon (talk) 10:17, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

I also read summaries too from some Translations too but it's still limited so it's better than nothing I'm leaving it to start and allow other people to contribute and expand on it

...incorrect information is NOT better than nothing. Escargon (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

That wasn't incorrect information it was from the result of mistranslations here's what I found if you have any doubts: https://mohairtranslations.wordpress.com/2020/09/07/translation-volcanicus-comic-1-and-2/. I put in my own words while keeping it true so I don't accused of plagiarizing and not make it too long.

Nowhere in there does it mention that Grimmaster dies. Escargon (talk) 10:26, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

If it's a mistranslatiom, it is by definition incorrect information. --Khajidha (talk) 10:31, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

No, that person's translations are correct, I can vouch for them. It's just this guy did not read them close enough. Escargon (talk) 10:33, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

Okay. I was just confused how Nelspeedrscer could claim that it wasn't incorrect and also that it was a mistranslation at the same time. --Khajidha (talk) 10:35, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

Well it's hard to tell if Grimstone died but he said "Thank you for accepting a former Decepticon like me… as a Dinobot…" In the Translation as if he was going to die

From the translation of Panel 6 of page 2 of comic 2: "Grimmaster, who thankfully isn’t dead, tosses his Combination Energon Matrix to Grimlock." --Khajidha (talk) 11:04, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

Ok so I'll just fix that mistake thenNelspeedracer (talk)

Dark Nova wiki expansion

So there are some Legends issues with Dark Nova NOT included in his wiki so I'm expanding on but with limited info of the wiki pages and comic I decided to only include what I can do. If something is wrong DON'T delete or undo. Fix and correct it instead. Nelspeedracer (talk) 12:25, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

If you do not have the info, DO NOT ADD IT. Nobody wants to fix a badly written section with missing or incorrect information. Escargon (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

I do have the info from the wiki and Translation Apps I have had and I got it all right just condensed so it doesn't take too much of it. Nelspeedracer (talk) 12:31, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

That is not the issue. Your edits are poorly written, use the wrong tense, and are often full of incorrect information. Escargon (talk) 12:34, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

Well I don't get my vocab well and an learning disability which is probably why so might cut a little slack on me a bit not a lot just a little I should put it in my user page Nelspeedracer (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

Regarding your edits

You don't understand Japanese, so don't add anything and don't rely on a machine translator/translator app because they still lack the ability to fully comprehend nuances that fluent/native speakers can.

You said you "don't get [your] vocab well" and as it seems you have "an learning disability," then it's best to have someone else check over the grammar and accuracy first, and use the "Show Preview" button before posting. That way we don't have to see the Recent Changes page filled up with a ton of small edits.

If you don't know or unsure of anything in an article, just add any of the related stub tags and don't add anything else at all because it's better to have no info than to have wrong info on stub articles, and it's less work on everyone.

Another thing is that certain pages are spelled certain ways, like Transformers Legends Final Chapter "Epiloge" using "Epiloge" instead of "Epilogue" because that's how it's spelled on the comic itself - if the official Hasbro/Takara products spell a name or word or title in a certain way, we follow that spelling even though it's spelled wrong (this is more common with most Japanese products).

Lastly, getting into an edit war with the others doesn't help your case on trying to justify your edits when you've been told why they were undone in the first place. If one of the moderators or someone else tells you why your edit was undone, don't ignore it. If you want to argue on adding in something, take it to the article's discussion page. --Lonegamer78 (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2020 (EDT)

Hacker harassment

Recently some hacker has been harassing me on all forms trying to ruin my reputation including on this site by jacking my I.P Address and always get away with it. I was hurt by the user vandalizing my page. Seriously I feel so harassed and user the keeps coming back over and over using an VPN to bypass ban. Nelspeedracer (talk)

No they're not. A quick google search turned up absolutely nothing of the sort. What happened was that you got caught in a lie, and now you're doubling down and pushing a fake story about being hacked in an attempt to get your account back. Unless you have real, incontrovertible evidence of a hack, please just stop embarrassing yourself. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2020 (EDT)

It’s not it’s what other people said too. You’ll probably want proof don’t you? Also some separate accounts of that said vandalized this page so how you can deny that kind of evidence you are obviously very stubborn demanding proof to clear my name don’t you? Also it’s an personal one so searches can’t find it Nelspeedracer (talk)

So what you're saying is you can't provide proof. So then why on Earth should we believe you? -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:54, 13 September 2020 (EDT)

We're done here. --M Sipher (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2020 (EDT)