User talk:159.134.163.42: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:33, 3 August 2007

Sorry about the earlier comment.

Why? I've done nothing wrong. You're the only one doing something wrong by trying to block someone's access to the site who's done nothing wrong. That's pretty nasty, actually. You do realise this shows up as a "New message" for me too, right? Pretty un-covert if you're trying to talk over my head. And very disrespectful if you knew what you were doing. I really can't see any way of looking at this situation that casts you as the good guy.
  • This isn't the right way to start a dialogue, Chiasaur11. But seriously, just tone it down a little. The image I'm getting of you is someone who is starting to foam at the mouth. -- SFH 19:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • No, but I am someone who's laughing quite a bit. I and some other of my friends have been pissed on a lot on forums and it's somewhat amusing to see people defending this kind of nonsense and really not succeeding even when they have a majority.
  • His only apparent motive is to vandalize. Rather than trying to have an actual discussion of whatever viewpoint he's trying to present on the talk pages, he's out to start stupid revert wars in the articles themselves. I don't see what we'd lose

by banning him. Chip 19:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Jesus, you know, this really botherss me. I would comment more in detail of how you're not backing up your claims of vandalism, merely using a weighted term to eliminate someone who's way of doing things you disagree with, but the way in which you talk about banning someone just because you don't think you've anything to loose makes me loose respect for you in ways you'd never imagine
It just shows what a disgusting, disrespectful, fascist mindset you must have. Are you by any chance a moderator on any of the major boards? Again, I'm not doing anything wrong. What I am contributing to that article is no different as to what was already there, just the flip side of the coin. What YOU'RE doing is trying to eliminate someone you disagree with. THAT is wrong.

Huzzah! Not the losing somebody, just the not having to deal with all the reverts.chiasaur11 12:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

You're the one doing the fucking reverts, not me. It's not my fault you can't deal with someone opposing someone else's opinion.