User talk:159.134.163.42

Sorry about the earlier comment.

Why? I've done nothing wrong. You're the only one doing something wrong by trying to block someone's access to the site who's done nothing wrong. That's pretty nasty, actually. You do realise this shows up as a "New message" for me too, right? Pretty un-covert if you're trying to talk over my head. And very disrespectful if you knew what you were doing. I really can't see any way of looking at this situation that casts you as the good guy.

• This isn't the right way to start a dialogue, Chiasaur11. But seriously, just tone it down a little. The image I'm getting of you is someone who is starting to foam at the mouth. -- SFH 19:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• No, but I am someone who's laughing quite a bit. I and some other of my friends have been pissed on a lot on forums and it's somewhat amusing to see people defending this kind of nonsense and really not succeeding even when they have a majority.

• His only apparent motive is to vandalize. Rather than trying to have an actual discussion of whatever viewpoint he's trying to present on the talk pages, he's out to start stupid revert wars in the articles themselves. I don't see what we'd lose

by banning him. Chip 19:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Jesus, you know, this really botherss me. I would comment more in detail of how you're not backing up your claims of vandalism, merely using a weighted term to eliminate someone who's way of doing things you disagree with, but the way in which you talk about banning someone just because you don't think you've anything to loose makes me loose respect for you in ways you'd never imagine

It just shows what a disgusting, disrespectful, fascist mindset you must have. Are you by any chance a moderator on any of the major boards? Again, I'm not doing anything wrong. What I am contributing to that article is no different as to what was already there, just the flip side of the coin. What YOU'RE doing is trying to eliminate someone you disagree with. THAT is wrong.

I don't want a revert war. I want my contribution to be left alone. There was NO justification for removing it, no matter what other weighted terms you throw around to try and get people to think I'm a mental patient.

Let me make sure I understand your argument. You should be able to do whatever you like with an article, since nothing you do, no matter how much it misses the point, can be objectionable to anyone. But if anyone else comes in after you and makes the same sort of changes, then that simply should not be allowed unless it's been fully discussed on the talk page. Is that it? You're just special?

No no no no NO. If you or anyone wants to make massive changes to an article that other users might disagree with, you use the goddamned Talk page first. That's how it works. There are helpful links right on the main page designed to explain the community's standards to anyone with an interest in being a serious contributor. Nobody is singling you out; you're being asked to comply with the same standards as anyone else, and you're refusing to do so. And yes, if you add something you know is likely to be a problem without going through the Talk page first, it is utterly ridiculous to claim that you're not looking to start a revert war. Don't lie to me about that, and don't throw around words like "fascist" just because we want you to play by the same rules we all happily abide by.

You disagree with something you see on the wiki? You want a discussion? Good! That's the entire reason for the talk pages. We want a wiki the fandom as a whole can enjoy, and that requires everyone's viewpoint. Nobody is oppressing you for your opinion, so you can drop the martyr act and maybe start honestly contributing. Chip 20:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Huzzah! Not the losing somebody, just the not having to deal with all the reverts.chiasaur11 12:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

You're the one doing the fucking reverts, not me. It's not my fault you can't deal with someone opposing someone else's opinion.

Let me try to put this into very simple terms that maybe you can understand.

Let's say someone wants to put something on a page that doesn't really fit, and that's going to bug others. For example, let's say Derik wants to put a big picture of his dick on the Beast Wars page. It's going to get reverted. It doesn't belong, no valid argument has been makde for keeping it, and it's going to get reverted. If Derik had kept putting it back up, forcing others to revert it, then we would have a revert war. That revert war would not be the fault of all those people trying to keep Derik down. It would be the fault of the person who required those reverts to be made in the first place.

...to choose a random, hypothetical examples. -Derik 01:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Do you not get that? You missed the point of the original article, and you wrote a ridiculously long screed filled with grammatical errors. In the interest of maintaining a wiki that someone womewhere might want to read, we have a right to fix that. Instigating a revert war is not the right way to get your opinion heard and discussed. The Talk pages exist. Chip 20:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Then try learning how to use the Wiki style:

1. Use of all caps is considered the equivalent as shouting.
2. Tone down the swearing; it makes you look bad.
3. Stop writting it like a disenfranchised blogger out to settle a score, start writting it like you actually want to satirize the subject.

-- SFH 19:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

No use posting so much Chip, he seems to be gone. chiasaur11

She's now deleting posts that disagree with her from the talk pages. IS there ANY reason not to ban this person? She's only here to attack others. Chip 00:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

• The pissed blogger anon isn't using this IP address anymore. And how do you know it's a girl? -- SFH 00:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
  • It's apparently Rosalie, a troll from the Allspark. And I figured it was easier to keep it all on a single talk page, even if she's jumped IPs a little. Chip 01:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
    • I suspect it's the same person adding extra movie hatred to "Hasbro" and "Ruined Forever" the last two days.--Thylacine 2000 19:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Please sign your posts

159.134.163.42 (Leader-1 for short): Please sign your posts on talk pages. It makes it much easier to tell who wrote what. You can use the odd signature button (between the NO W and -- buttons) or type "--~~~~" (minus the quotes)--FortMax 00:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)