Talk:Rav (BM): Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
Jackpot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Is "canon" really appropriate here, because Transformers has never really had one, and none of the fan club stuff (regardless of which club) will ever trump the mass-released fiction. Maybe there's a better way to phrase it? (And I'm feeling a little too thick at the moment to figure out how, myself.) -[[User:TFVanguard|TFVanguard]] 20:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Is "canon" really appropriate here, because Transformers has never really had one, and none of the fan club stuff (regardless of which club) will ever trump the mass-released fiction. Maybe there's a better way to phrase it? (And I'm feeling a little too thick at the moment to figure out how, myself.) -[[User:TFVanguard|TFVanguard]] 20:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


: See [[Canon]]. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 20:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>
: See [[Canon]]. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 20:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 
:You should know better than that, Neale, but I'll answer for the sake of reinforcing common knowledge:
:a) TF ''does'' have a [[Canon|canon]]:  It's everything that Hasbro and/or Takara have ever put their stamp of approval on.  This means there are a bajillion continuities that are all simultaneously canon.  This has even been acknowledged in the fiction, thanks to several dimensional-crossover stories in the past few years.
:b) "Rav" the blue Deployer is toy-canon.  "Chro" the blue Deployer is ''Wreckers''-canon.  Since the latter actively disregarded the former, that's the direction of retcon referred to in the article.  But all the facts remain on the Wiki; we don't IGNORE blue-Rav or relegate all the information to the Chro article.  And it's all still canon, because it all went out with Hasbro's blessing.
:- [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 20:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Revision as of 20:43, 24 August 2007

Is "canon" really appropriate here, because Transformers has never really had one, and none of the fan club stuff (regardless of which club) will ever trump the mass-released fiction. Maybe there's a better way to phrase it? (And I'm feeling a little too thick at the moment to figure out how, myself.) -TFVanguard 20:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

See Canon. --M Sipher 20:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
You should know better than that, Neale, but I'll answer for the sake of reinforcing common knowledge:
a) TF does have a canon: It's everything that Hasbro and/or Takara have ever put their stamp of approval on. This means there are a bajillion continuities that are all simultaneously canon. This has even been acknowledged in the fiction, thanks to several dimensional-crossover stories in the past few years.
b) "Rav" the blue Deployer is toy-canon. "Chro" the blue Deployer is Wreckers-canon. Since the latter actively disregarded the former, that's the direction of retcon referred to in the article. But all the facts remain on the Wiki; we don't IGNORE blue-Rav or relegate all the information to the Chro article. And it's all still canon, because it all went out with Hasbro's blessing.
- Jackpot 20:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)