Talk:Blitzwing (Animated): Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
JW (talk | contribs)
Line 18: Line 18:
For the sake of wiki integrity (I'll wait while you snicker), I'd recommend establishing a citation ASAP for that interview mentioning the idea for the character who can transform into anything.  Also, while it's kind of interesting, I think the whole tie-in to three-faced representations of Buddha/Hindu deities is ''really'' tangential at best.--[[User:Apcog|Apcog]] 15:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
For the sake of wiki integrity (I'll wait while you snicker), I'd recommend establishing a citation ASAP for that interview mentioning the idea for the character who can transform into anything.  Also, while it's kind of interesting, I think the whole tie-in to three-faced representations of Buddha/Hindu deities is ''really'' tangential at best.--[[User:Apcog|Apcog]] 15:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
:Okay, citation's in.  (Thank you, Walky.)--[[User:Apcog|Apcog]] 15:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
:Okay, citation's in.  (Thank you, Walky.)--[[User:Apcog|Apcog]] 15:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
::''"I think the whole tie-in to three-faced representations of Buddha/Hindu deities is ''really'' tangential at best"''  How do you feel about the Man-E-Faces and Ashuraman stuff?  It's equally relevant.  [[User:JW|JW]] 15:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>
::''"I think the whole tie-in to three-faced representations of Buddha/Hindu deities is ''really'' tangential at best"''  How do you feel about the Man-E-Faces and Ashuraman stuff?  It's equally relevant.  [[User:JW|JW]] 15:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
:::Man-E-Faces is a toy with a three-face switching gimmick. As such, it is ''just slightly'' more relevant to ''another'' toy with a three-face switching gimmick than, say, ''Hindu mythology''.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Revision as of 16:11, 20 February 2008

Considering the way his Angry face talks, might it be worth it to replace the Letterman reference with an Arnold Schwarzenegger reference? --Detour 19:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Works either way for me, but Letterman's just who I thought of first. Of course, as you note, with the whole Teutonic accent thing (NB: I haven't seen the episode yet, but that's not a big spoiler for me), Ah-nold might be a closer comparison. The idea of a feverish Letterman strikes me as funnier, though.--Apcog 20:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Good point, but Arnold also has a gap in his teeth. I think the ressemblance to Arnold was intentional, much like that Rainier Wolfcastle fellow. --Detour 20:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Point taken, especially now that I've watched the scene myself--Apcog 23:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Toy Feet

Okay, whenever we get a pic of his robot mode, I nominate it be captioned: "i hAv FEEEET!11 yAy!"--Apcog 23:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey where is his vehicle mode? Do you have any proof that he is a triple changer?(EDD! 01:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC))

Yes. --ItsWalky 01:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Well where is it then? I will pay you $9999999999 dollars if you can show an image of him in his two vehicle modes.(EDD! 01:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC))

They were seen at BotCon, so the pictures aren't publically available. - Chris McFeely 01:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
http://tformers.com/ig.php?mode=view&album=8194&pic=DSCF1322.JPG&dispsize=800&start=60 I expect payment. --ItsWalky 01:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Trivia section

For the sake of wiki integrity (I'll wait while you snicker), I'd recommend establishing a citation ASAP for that interview mentioning the idea for the character who can transform into anything. Also, while it's kind of interesting, I think the whole tie-in to three-faced representations of Buddha/Hindu deities is really tangential at best.--Apcog 15:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, citation's in. (Thank you, Walky.)--Apcog 15:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
"I think the whole tie-in to three-faced representations of Buddha/Hindu deities is really tangential at best" How do you feel about the Man-E-Faces and Ashuraman stuff? It's equally relevant. JW 15:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Man-E-Faces is a toy with a three-face switching gimmick. As such, it is just slightly more relevant to another toy with a three-face switching gimmick than, say, Hindu mythology.--RosicrucianTalk 16:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)