Talk:LEGO: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
So I'm kind on in doubt, in what category should the upcoming BrickHeadz be placed? Icons Prime and Bumblebee are listed in their respective pages as toys rather than merchandise (as they should be since they're fully transforming articulated figures), but the fact that the BrickHeadz are chibified non-Transforming, non-articulated little statues feels far more reminiscent of what would traditionally go into a "merchandise" section - but then again, if we put the BrickHeadz as merchandise then it feels like we'll be leaving the "Lego" section of their toy pages incomplete, so I don't know, there's also an argument here that maybe we shouldn't split the Lego brand across two different pages. Thoughts? ([[User:FortressMaxxing|FortressMaxxing]] ([[User talk:FortressMaxxing|talk]]) 12:38, 30 January 2025 (EST)) | So I'm kind on in doubt, in what category should the upcoming BrickHeadz be placed? Icons Prime and Bumblebee are listed in their respective pages as toys rather than merchandise (as they should be since they're fully transforming articulated figures), but the fact that the BrickHeadz are chibified non-Transforming, non-articulated little statues feels far more reminiscent of what would traditionally go into a "merchandise" section - but then again, if we put the BrickHeadz as merchandise then it feels like we'll be leaving the "Lego" section of their toy pages incomplete, so I don't know, there's also an argument here that maybe we shouldn't split the Lego brand across two different pages. Thoughts? ([[User:FortressMaxxing|FortressMaxxing]] ([[User talk:FortressMaxxing|talk]]) 12:38, 30 January 2025 (EST)) | ||
:the [[Optimus_Prime_(G1)/toys#Nanoblock_Motion_Choro-Q|nanoblock choro-q sets]] follow the same general format and they're placed categorized as toys --[[User:Arren1234|Arren Meuchel]] ([[User talk:Arren1234|talk]]) 13:48, 30 January 2025 (EST) | :the [[Optimus_Prime_(G1)/toys#Nanoblock_Motion_Choro-Q|nanoblock choro-q sets]] follow the same general format and they're placed categorized as toys --[[User:Arren1234|Arren Meuchel]] ([[User talk:Arren1234|talk]]) 13:48, 30 January 2025 (EST) | ||
::Should those also be categorized that way though? I mean... Super deformed non-transforming things kinda feel like textbook merchandise ([[User:FortressMaxxing|FortressMaxxing]] ([[User talk:FortressMaxxing|talk]]) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (EST)) | |||
Revision as of 03:04, 31 January 2025
Are the BrickHeadz toys or mechandise?
So I'm kind on in doubt, in what category should the upcoming BrickHeadz be placed? Icons Prime and Bumblebee are listed in their respective pages as toys rather than merchandise (as they should be since they're fully transforming articulated figures), but the fact that the BrickHeadz are chibified non-Transforming, non-articulated little statues feels far more reminiscent of what would traditionally go into a "merchandise" section - but then again, if we put the BrickHeadz as merchandise then it feels like we'll be leaving the "Lego" section of their toy pages incomplete, so I don't know, there's also an argument here that maybe we shouldn't split the Lego brand across two different pages. Thoughts? (FortressMaxxing (talk) 12:38, 30 January 2025 (EST))
- the nanoblock choro-q sets follow the same general format and they're placed categorized as toys --Arren Meuchel (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2025 (EST)
- Should those also be categorized that way though? I mean... Super deformed non-transforming things kinda feel like textbook merchandise (FortressMaxxing (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (EST))
