Talk:Diaclone: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
→About the catalogs.: new section |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== About the catalogs. == | == About the catalogs. == | ||
I found some catalogs pics [http://1501bc.com/pretf/diaclone_catalogs.html here], it would be valid if I take some of those for the article? [[User:MESIAS ROCKET|MESIAS_ROCKET]] 22:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | I found some catalogs pics [http://1501bc.com/pretf/diaclone_catalogs.html here], it would be valid if I take some of those for the article? [[User:MESIAS ROCKET|MESIAS_ROCKET]] 22:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:30, 23 March 2009
So, how much of the Diaclone line was actually used for Transformers? Was it all of it? Only some it? --Gouki 11:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Almost the entirety of the 1982, '83, and '84 molds were turned into Transformers. Specifically, starting with d37 (Countach Super Tuning) through d96 (Triple Changer jet/tank) along with w(aruder, the villains)7 through w10 (which became the Insecticons). Oddly, the last toy released for each faction, the helicopter/jet Triple Changer and Machine Dragon respectively, never became Transformers. Also left out were d63 through d65, the three Change Attackers. These were presumably shunned because they transformed from real civilian vehicles to combat vehicles instead of robots (ala the slightly later Kenner MASK), which would have gone against the ban on drivers in Transformers. You can see all the toys from their Super Robot beginnings in 1980 to the end here: http://diaclone.net/orid/list.html -Rotty 17:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, cool, thanks for that. So... since you know far more about it than I, should we actually put this sort of information in the actual page? --Gouki 03:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
About the catalogs.
I found some catalogs pics here, it would be valid if I take some of those for the article? MESIAS_ROCKET 22:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
