Talk:Terrorcon (G1): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:True, the Energon Terrorcons are more prominent, but these guys aren't exactly throw aways either. -- [[User:SFH|SFH]] 00:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | :True, the Energon Terrorcons are more prominent, but these guys aren't exactly throw aways either. -- [[User:SFH|SFH]] 00:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
::And if we had 3- it would go to the disambig page. We have 2. It goes to one or the other. Mind if I move it? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | ::And if we had 3- it would go to the disambig page. We have 2. It goes to one or the other. Mind if I move it? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:28, 24 March 2009
Terrorcon currently directs here. I argue that the Energon Terrorcons are more prominent (being an essential series element) and it should go there. Are there any dissenting opinions? -Derik 00:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- True, the Energon Terrorcons are more prominent, but these guys aren't exactly throw aways either. -- SFH 00:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- And if we had 3- it would go to the disambig page. We have 2. It goes to one or the other. Mind if I move it? -Derik 00:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
