Talk:Stylor: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
''low armor class''<BR> | ''low armor class''<BR> | ||
It used to be that in D&D low armor class was good, but for the past few years ''high'' armor class has been good. Either I don't get this joke, or it's out of date. [[User:JW|JW]] 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | It used to be that in D&D low armor class was good, but for the past few years ''high'' armor class has been good. Either I don't get this joke, or it's out of date. [[User:JW|JW]] 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:As an 80's toy, low armor class is definitely what is aimed for...--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 15:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | :As an 80's toy, low armor class is definitely what is aimed for...--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 15:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:11, 26 March 2009
Low Armor Class?
low armor class
It used to be that in D&D low armor class was good, but for the past few years high armor class has been good. Either I don't get this joke, or it's out of date. JW 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- As an 80's toy, low armor class is definitely what is aimed for...--Rosicrucian 15:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
