Talk:BotCon 2009: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::And really, one does not need the patience of Job to wait until these things come through official channels.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:40, 23 April 2009 (EDT) | :::And really, one does not need the patience of Job to wait until these things come through official channels.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:40, 23 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::Thanks for asking first, though. Lots of people just put them up there without finding out if it's okay first. -- [[User:Semysane|Semysane]] 21:42, 23 April 2009 (EDT) | ::::Thanks for asking first, though. Lots of people just put them up there without finding out if it's okay first. -- [[User:Semysane|Semysane]] 21:42, 23 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::Thanks for the info, all. --[[User:GrantB|GrantB]] 21:28, 24 April 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:28, 25 April 2009
Leaked add-ons?
Is there a Wiki policy against listing leaked add-ons on the page? Surprised that the four (so far) leaks are not here. Any objection to adding them, as long as it's noted that they are leaks?
An argument could be made that we don't know these leaks are for BotCon, but c'mon, the baggies in the photos say "BotCon 2009". Is there any doubt? --GrantB 21:28, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
- I have significant objections to adding them.--RosicrucianTalk 21:30, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
- Yeah, we have a pretty big NO NO NO NO policy against leaks. Absolutely not, under any circumstance. --ItsWalky 21:35, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
- And really, one does not need the patience of Job to wait until these things come through official channels.--RosicrucianTalk 21:40, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
- Yeah, we have a pretty big NO NO NO NO policy against leaks. Absolutely not, under any circumstance. --ItsWalky 21:35, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
