Talk:Theodore Galloway: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Apparently his full name is Theodore Galloway, and he's played by John Benjamin Hickey. I would recommend desnarking the opening of this article. This is one case of humour getting in the way of conveying information, because it's forcing somebody to read a totally unrelated article to "get" that the ''entire'' opening paragraph is a joke. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 17:07, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | Apparently his full name is Theodore Galloway, and he's played by John Benjamin Hickey. I would recommend desnarking the opening of this article. This is one case of humour getting in the way of conveying information, because it's forcing somebody to read a totally unrelated article to "get" that the ''entire'' opening paragraph is a joke. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 17:07, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Yes, that needs a total rewrite. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:43, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | ::Yes, that needs a total rewrite. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 19:43, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Source on the first name? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 17:41, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | :Source on the first name? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 17:41, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
::About a billion entertainment and related sites, so I assume it was part of a press package. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 18:07, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | ::About a billion entertainment and related sites, so I assume it was part of a press package. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 18:07, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Odd he didn't get a first name in any of the books then. Oh well. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 18:09, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | :::Odd he didn't get a first name in any of the books then. Oh well. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 18:09, 17 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:44, 17 June 2009
Apparently his full name is Theodore Galloway, and he's played by John Benjamin Hickey. I would recommend desnarking the opening of this article. This is one case of humour getting in the way of conveying information, because it's forcing somebody to read a totally unrelated article to "get" that the entire opening paragraph is a joke. --FFN 17:07, 17 June 2009 (EDT)
- Yes, that needs a total rewrite. --KilMichaelMcC 19:43, 17 June 2009 (EDT)
