Talk:Devastator (ROTF): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* 2010 for Legends class? Say it ain't so! [[Special:Contributions/82.41.72.10|82.41.72.10]] 18:42, 13 June 2009 (EDT) | * 2010 for Legends class? Say it ain't so! [[Special:Contributions/82.41.72.10|82.41.72.10]] 18:42, 13 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
Should Devastator's various toy descriptions be revised? Majorish spoilers:<font color=black style="background:black"> In the film, there are at least two sets of constructicons, as they appear both as induviduals and as Devastator simultaniously, or else shown to be incapacitated to such a degree that the could not be a part of him. More importantly, the ones that form Devastator are not shown to have robot modes of their own.(although the supreme toy is still inacurate since Overload's vehicle is a clear part of Devastator)</font> The acuracy of the figures should not have been brought into question before there was something to compare them to. Simple as that.[[User:Thelastallosaur|Thelastallosaur]] 18:38, 20 June 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:38, 20 June 2009
7 Seven vehicles
Paramount listing mention 7 constructicons vehicles, Overload is the not-mentioned-before seventh one: http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/01/tranformers-2-robots-announced/ --GUIGUI 17:33, 2 April 2009 (EDT)
- Can we put somewhere on this page a link to either the seven Constructicons or the group page?KrytenKoro 14:04, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
- A leaked image of legends class construction group even cofirms it...and might i add that they actualy combine into devastator?--Sunjumper 05:47, 12 May 2009 (EDT)
Was the Paramount listing officially released? -Derik 10:54, 12 May 2009 (EDT)
- Yes. --ItsWalky 11:06, 12 May 2009 (EDT)
I gather Takara has an upcoming toy that makes the whole thing much clearer.
Can someone who is not me use this to add altmodes to the list of names? -Derik 20:56, 12 May 2009 (EDT)
- 2010 for Legends class? Say it ain't so! 82.41.72.10 18:42, 13 June 2009 (EDT)
Should Devastator's various toy descriptions be revised? Majorish spoilers: In the film, there are at least two sets of constructicons, as they appear both as induviduals and as Devastator simultaniously, or else shown to be incapacitated to such a degree that the could not be a part of him. More importantly, the ones that form Devastator are not shown to have robot modes of their own.(although the supreme toy is still inacurate since Overload's vehicle is a clear part of Devastator) The acuracy of the figures should not have been brought into question before there was something to compare them to. Simple as that.Thelastallosaur 18:38, 20 June 2009 (EDT)
