Talk:Transformer naming: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I question the validity of this article. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 22:19, 2 August 2009 (EDT) | I question the validity of this article. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 22:19, 2 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I concur. "Safe to ''assume''", that's a problem. For all we know, the speech on Cybertron is translated to English, and Bumblebee's untranslated name is a term that describes a small buzzing insectlike robot. However, that's conjecture. I do not think this page should stick around because it lacks sources and concrete facts. [[Special:Contributions/98.209.73.178|98.209.73.178]] 22:30, 2 August 2009 (EDT) | :I concur. "Safe to ''assume''", that's a problem. For all we know, the speech on Cybertron is translated to English, and Bumblebee's untranslated name is a term that describes a small buzzing insectlike robot. However, that's conjecture. I do not think this page should stick around because it lacks sources and concrete facts. [[Special:Contributions/98.209.73.178|98.209.73.178]] 22:30, 2 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::You could get a decent article out of this. Instances when TF's note that their real names are unpronouncable, that they've chosen designations equivilant or whatnot... | |||
::...but this article is not that. Even the opening sentence has like 3 problems with it. I'd bad celetion unless someone is interested in doing a total rewerite. (and by rewrite, I mean 'scrap this and start with a blank page.') -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 01:05, 3 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 05:05, 3 August 2009
I question the validity of this article. --M Sipher 22:19, 2 August 2009 (EDT)
- I concur. "Safe to assume", that's a problem. For all we know, the speech on Cybertron is translated to English, and Bumblebee's untranslated name is a term that describes a small buzzing insectlike robot. However, that's conjecture. I do not think this page should stick around because it lacks sources and concrete facts. 98.209.73.178 22:30, 2 August 2009 (EDT)
- You could get a decent article out of this. Instances when TF's note that their real names are unpronouncable, that they've chosen designations equivilant or whatnot...
- ...but this article is not that. Even the opening sentence has like 3 problems with it. I'd bad celetion unless someone is interested in doing a total rewerite. (and by rewrite, I mean 'scrap this and start with a blank page.') -Derik 01:05, 3 August 2009 (EDT)
